Hi All, do we still use "vfs://" urls in AS7? My understanding was we would not have any more vfs urls so that the Java Security Manager can work with File urls. :) https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossAS7SecurityRunningUnderAJavaSecurit... The comments to this article state that there are still vfs:// urls. Regards, Anil _______________________________________________ jboss-as7-dev mailing list jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev

And if users want to write security manager policy statements for these deployments? On 04/02/2012 11:24 AM, Ales Justin wrote: > They are used in deployments, but not in modules. > >> Hi All, >> do we still use "vfs://" urls in AS7? My understanding was we would >> not have any more vfs urls so that the Java Security Manager can work >> with File urls. :) >> >> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossAS7SecurityRunningUnderAJavaSecurit... >> >> The comments to this article state that there are still vfs:// urls. >> >> Regards, >> Anil >>

Ales, any chance the codesource urls for these deploymets will be a derivative of the File url? Cheers. On 04/02/2012 11:55 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote: > And if users want to write security manager policy statements for these > deployments? > > On 04/02/2012 11:24 AM, Ales Justin wrote: >> They are used in deployments, but not in modules. >> >>> Hi All, >>> do we still use "vfs://" urls in AS7? My understanding was we would >>> not have any more vfs urls so that the Java Security Manager can work >>> with File urls. :) >>> >>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossAS7SecurityRunningUnderAJavaSecurit... >>> >>> The comments to this article state that there are still vfs:// urls. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Anil >>> _______________________________________________ jboss-as7-dev mailing list jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev

Are you sure? It's a bug if so Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Bartosz Baranowski<bbaranow(a)redhat.com> wrote: > How should it be handled than? Policy fails to parse those, hence, deployment vfs entries are ignored and not included in permission collection. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason T. Greene"<jason.greene(a)redhat.com> > To: "Anil Saldhana"<Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com> > Cc: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 4:08:07 PM > Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] AS7 using vfs urls? > > Deployments have to use vfs url's, but we only have one kind. > > On 4/3/12 8:46 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote: >> Ales, >> any chance the codesource urls for these deploymets will be a >> derivative of the File url? >> >> Cheers. >> >> On 04/02/2012 11:55 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote: >>> And if users want to write security manager policy statements for these >>> deployments? >>> >>> On 04/02/2012 11:24 AM, Ales Justin wrote: >>>> They are used in deployments, but not in modules. >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> do we still use "vfs://" urls in AS7? My understanding was we would >>>>> not have any more vfs urls so that the Java Security Manager can work >>>>> with File urls. :) >>>>> >>>>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossAS7SecurityRunningUnderAJavaSecurit... >>>>> >>>>> The comments to this article state that there are still vfs:// urls. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Anil >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-as7-dev mailing list >> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev > > > -- > Jason T. Greene > JBoss AS Lead / EAP Platform Architect > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > jboss-as7-dev mailing list > jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev