[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-4237) Possible errrors
by Yamamoto Mie (JIRA)
Yamamoto Mie created AS7-4237:
---------------------------------
Summary: Possible errrors
Key: AS7-4237
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4237
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Documentation
Reporter: Yamamoto Mie
Priority: Minor
I have a few questions about AS7 and also found possible errors in the doc.
Questions:
- Null owned session update
can you explain when is this message shown?
- to multiple create* methods with different return types on home %s
when is this message shown?
to create* multiple methods?? or multiple create() methods?
- EJB component for address %s is in
Is this EJB component for address %s is in (state %s)?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Possible errors
- Class %s has more *that* one constructor annotated with @Inject
-> more than?
- Boolean to determine whether to create create the tables
- Boolean to determine whether to create drop the tables
- Timeout, in seconds, a deployment is allows to execute before being canceled. The default is 60 seconds.
- Filed to lookup: %s
- Specifies whether the ejb3 container need only (to?) provide the "LITE" profile of the specification. This value should only be false when using the "everything" distro.
- Removes a specific (a) bean instance pool which has a strict upper limit for bean instances
-No timed object invoke(d) for %s
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8824) Cardinality constraints on children are not enforced after parsing
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Cardinality constraints on children are not enforced after parsing
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8824
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8824
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Alpha1
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta1
The parsers enforce cardinality constraints on child elements in the model, but they aren't enforced thereafter. So, for example, a second "profile" or "socket-binding-group" could be added to a standalone server via a management operation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-4383) Mode to disable writing deployment outcome files to deployment scanner dir
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Brian Stansberry created AS7-4383:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Mode to disable writing deployment outcome files to deployment scanner dir
Key: AS7-4383
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4383
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.2.0.Alpha1
Investigate adding a config option that disables writing the .isdeploying, .deployed, .isundeploying, .undeployed files to the deployment scanner dir.
Idea is to make it possible to have multiple scanners on different nodes sharing the deployment directory, without having the markers from one interfere with another.
This may not be practical at all in reality; needs investigation.
Marker files created by the user to control deployment should still be supported.
The .failed and .pending files are a bit of a gray area that need investigation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-4428) Arquillian: IllegalStateException: standard-sockets -> http -> bound-port is undefined
by Ondrej Zizka (JIRA)
Ondrej Zizka created AS7-4428:
---------------------------------
Summary: Arquillian: IllegalStateException: standard-sockets -> http -> bound-port is undefined
Key: AS7-4428
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4428
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Test Suite
Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
Assignee: Ondrej Zizka
This happens sometimes in QA lab, probably due to slowness.
See https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/AS7-TS-valid-mvn-all-ipv6/56/testR...
{code}
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: standard-sockets -> http -> bound-port is undefined
at org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.ManagementClient.getBinding(ManagementClient.java:222)
at org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.ManagementClient.getWebUri(ManagementClient.java:111)
at org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.ManagementClient.getDeploymentMetaData(ManagementClient.java:117)
at org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.CommonDeployableContainer.deploy(CommonDeployableContainer.java:150)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController$3.call(ContainerDeployController.java:156)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController$3.call(ContainerDeployController.java:123)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController.executeOperation(ContainerDeployController.java:266)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController.deploy(ContainerDeployController.java:122)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:99)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:81)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.createDeploymentContext(ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.java:78)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.createContainerContext(ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.java:57)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.DeploymentExceptionHandler.verifyExpectedExceptionDuringDeploy(DeploymentExceptionHandler.java:50)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:134)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController$1.perform(ContainerDeployController.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController$1.perform(ContainerDeployController.java:79)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController.forEachDeployment(ContainerDeployController.java:258)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController.forEachManagedDeployment(ContainerDeployController.java:234)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerDeployController.deployManaged(ContainerDeployController.java:78)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:99)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:81)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:134)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67)
at org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.ContainerEventController.execute(ContainerEventController.java:101)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:99)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:81)
at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createClassContext(TestContextHandler.java:75)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88)
at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:60)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:134)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeClass(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:80)
at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$2.evaluate(Arquillian.java:182)
at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.multiExecute(Arquillian.java:314)
at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.access$100(Arquillian.java:46)
at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$3.evaluate(Arquillian.java:199)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:147)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:234)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:133)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:114)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:188)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:166)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:86)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:101)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: standard-sockets -> http -> bound-port is undefined
at org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.ManagementClient.defined(ManagementClient.java:193)
at org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.ManagementClient.getBinding(ManagementClient.java:218)
... 96 more
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-1317) STABLE: compress STABLE messages
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
STABLE: compress STABLE messages
--------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1317
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1317
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.12.2, 3.1
For large clusters, stable messages are quite large, and should be compressed.
E.g.:
- Don't send the entire view (with all members), but only the ViewId, then the indices of a digest array would point to the rank of a member within the referred-to ViewId
- A digest has 3 longs (low, highest_received and highest_delivered). Do we need all 3 every time ?
- Compress the 3 longs into 1 long and 2 shorts: the latter 2 are offsets from the first seqno
- Use a bit set (consisting of a variable number of ints) to set the 3 variables
- If we have a digest (0), 0, 0: send a special marker
- Canonicalize digests: if everyone has (14) 20, 22, then we could write it once, give it an ID of (say) 1 and then only refer to 1 again if we encounter the same digest. Actually, as a matter of fact, most of the digests would be the same, so this optimization could have a big effect !
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months