July 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Can Seam be configured to support JSP and Facelets in an

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

"gfzhang" wrote : | I do not know why the program failed when using"/*" as the url-pattern. It can not work here either. It display the same error message as you reported. I don't think JSF supports that.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957057#3957057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957057

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Breaking changes to pageflow

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Do you understand the use of <start-page> in newer releases of Seam? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957056#3957056 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957056

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: session bean in conversation context destroy method

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

You certainly should not be accessing the database from a conversation timeout. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957055#3957055 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957055

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Accessing a protected JSF page causes

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Ignore em. I get them too. They don't seem to cause a problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957054#3957054 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957054

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to invoke a business process in JBoss

by kukeltje

No answers? I'll only respond to one thing now, the 3.0.3/3.1.1 thing. The moment you mentioned you were using 3.03 instead of the latest 3.1.x you got an answer that 3.03 and 3.1 are different. If you had stated that earlier, you would have gotten a more specific response. Still then, the examples/testcases that come with the 3.03 source clearly show how to use the api. I'll let Tom/Koen respond to the other questions (Assuming you've read the fine document about posting smart questions) and if they want me to stop answering questions, I will, certainly. I do not want my personal attitude to have a negative impact on JBoss, so that is up to them. In the future, I'll *not* respond to *any* basic questions again. May the source be with you _________________ Ronald Former jBPM forum moderator View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957053#3957053 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957053

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Breaking changes to pageflow

by rpiaggio

Ok, solved the problem. The ClassCastException seems to happen when the flow cannot land on a page. In this case, the problem of not working on the page action seemed to derive from having an unnamed transition on the start-state. This would match on a normal action but not on the page action. This is how the pageflow and code looked like: | <start-state name="start"> | <transition to="selectSource"> | <action expression="#{sourceManager.selectSource}"/> | </transition> | </start-state> | @Begin(pageflow="PaymentAuthorization") | public void start() { | } | Everything worked OK when I changed to: <start-state name="start"> | <transition name="proceed" to="selectSource"> | <action expression="#{sourceManager.selectSource}"/> | </transition> | </start-state> @Begin(pageflow="PaymentAuthorization") | public String start() { | return "proceed"; | } | If this is a bug, it's a very minor one. Actually, I think that having an unnamed transition should make it the default one, and should always be triggered when all other transitions don't match. This would ensure the pageflow always works. Any opinions on this feature request before I JIRA it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957052#3957052 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957052

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: Remote Client to EJB 3.0 fail .. :( javax.naming.Communi

by J0Ke

how can i scan all contexts for the bean is there a subcontext or somehtink :( help pls. PeterJ your the only hope :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957051#3957051 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957051

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - same user in own portal

by AFGG

Hi, I have created an own Portal and need to know, how I can get the user of JBoss Portal to use it like user in my portal? Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957050#3957050 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957050

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Performance Tuning] - Re: Performance Disapointment

by pferreira

Sorry for the repetition but I pressed submit before I finished :P --- I'm running a custom benchmark which simulates an intensive database access to a J2EE aplication I've migrated from OpenEJB 1.4 + Tomcat 5.0 to JBossAS 4.0.4: A single client, requesting 1, 10, 100, 1000 and 10000 ocurrences of the test case; Multiple clients (1, 10 and 100 threads) requesting 1, 10 and 100 ocurrences of the test case (to test the connection pool). The results I've got so far are very disappointing. JBoss is up to 2 x slower than OpenEJB + Tomcat 5.0 (in my test, of course). The J2EE aplication uses the DAO pattern for persistence. The DBMS is MS SQL Server 2000 and I'm using the jTDS driver. The test case simulates a set typical uses for the aplication (only reads). I've made some optimizations (log4j level = ERROR & file only) but it doesn't seem to have a significant impact on the performance. Any suggestions / questions / help would be apreciated. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957048#3957048 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957048

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Deployment order of dependent process definitions

by kukeltje

this is ideed my understanding of how it works. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957046#3957046 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957046

20 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user July 2006