[JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to invoke a business process in JBoss
by brado
"cpob" wrote : 3.0.3 and 3.1.1 have a lot of differences, especially around the JbpmContext I believe.
|
| Is there a reason you are using 3.0.3? I'd suggest 3.1.1 if you could.
cpob,
Thanks so much for the helpful reply. Yes there was a reason I was using 3.0.3, because the demo on the JBoss web site used 3.0.3. If the whole ballgame is now 3.1.1, and has significant differences to 3.0.3, it might be a good idea to have a demo that addresses 3.1.1, not 3.0.3. I'll switch to 3.1.1.
In retrospect (cpob, this is a reply in general, not to you), after spending 4 days playing ping-pong with vague RTFM-like responses, I really wish that our developer community in general would drop the attitude and just help others, without the need for a jab at others. People ask questions for reasons, sometimes very legitimate reasons that will never be understood if you are jumping to opportunities to be condescending.
The one card I haven't showed is that I've had a two-fold purpose in my post, which I intentionally made a basic question, and that was to gauge the quality of JBoss support, and the general demeanor of the people at JBoss. I'm a consultant, with many clients, and I have watched this thread as an indication of what kind of support experience my clients can expect with jBPM: whether they would get courteous answers, or whether they would run into those who would choose instead to put them down and/or send them on an easter egg hunt for answers. People ought to recognize that on a forum, there are opportunities to make friends, associates, and if you are associated with the developer, to gain a customer and a reference. Or likewise, you can alienate people, and send them elsewhere.
Thanks to everyone who was helpful. Help is truly appreciated.
Brad
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957029#3957029
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957029
20 years, 1 month
[EJB 3.0] - Re: ManyToOne and ManyToMany foreign key issues
by rfreden
For that I get: javax.ejb.EJBException: javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.PersistentObjectException: detached entity passed to persist: entity.Test2
on the line that reads: entityManager.persist(t1);
I guess that this is because the Test2 objects are being re-persisted, so I modified it to read:
Test1 t1=new Test1();
ArrayList<Test2> a=new ArrayList<Test2>();
Test2 t2=new Test2();
t2.setField(1);
entityManager.persist(t2);
a.add(t2);
t2=new Test2();
t2.setField(2);
entityManager.persist(t2);
a.add(t2);
// t1.setTest2s(a);
t1.setField(1);
entityManager.persist(t1);
t1.setTest2s(a);
entityManager.merge(t1);
the only issue being that the results are as in the initial case: no foreign keys
I failed to mention it previously, but as to my ManyToMany relationships--the join table is created, and correctly, but there are never any rows inserted, even though either side has the correct data
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957028#3957028
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957028
20 years, 1 month
[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Example uses superstate
by hosierdm
Well, I know that the answers to most questions asked in here are in that guide, so I have it bookmarked. When I see an easy question like this, I open the guide from a bookmark, do a FIND on the topic, and voila....almost always comes up in the Table of Contents of the User Guide. Why waste my time with Google when I already know the User Guide answers most questions? :) Anyone who is serious about working with jBPM should bookmark the User Guide in their browser from day one. You might add a sticky to the top of the forum that says "READ USER GUIDE FIRST". If someone asks a question that is easily answered by the User Guide, that user is banned for life from asking questions! Just kidding....kind of. :p
I was also thinking that a sticky that makes it clear that the webapp is NOT part of jBPM in the sense that it's the only way to interact with jBPM would be nice. I've seen way too many questions lately that seem to indicate that people have this misconception. Basically they have the notion that if the webapp does not support feature XYZ, they are screwed and don't know what to do.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957023#3957023
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957023
20 years, 1 month