July 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Portal] - Defaulting to the login page

by creative77

Can someone tell me how to always default to the login page and not the default page. Where is the xml file to make this change. Normal default is: http://localhost:8080/portal navigates to default page. Login default is: http://localhost:8080/portal/auth navigates to login page. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957110#3957110 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957110

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Slow load up time for Portal 2.4.0 CR1

by kraptor

IE has this problem where you leave the computer idle for a while and when you open up a new browser and try to login, it takes forever to load and has to be refreshed in order to come up... Is it just me or has anyone else faced slow load times on occasion for IE or any other browser? Thanks... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957109#3957109 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957109

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Beginning conversations in @Factory methods

by iradix

I have a pretty typical CRUD application. A @DataModel is generated by a @Factory method which is also annotated with @Begin(join = true); so far so good. However when a create operation occurs the corresponding method is annotated with @End and this is where things go wrong. If I don't set the list to null my subsequent page displays the list generated by the ended conversation, even though I've issued a redirect. I'd imagine this is because a conversation's state is not cleared until a response is rendered? Anyway, if I do set the list to null, it seems that the @DataModel annotation causes the @Factory method to be called directly after the create method thereby re-propogating the conversation I just tried to end. I can't seem to find a way around this. Any suggestions on how to fix the problem or an alternate design? -Dave View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957108#3957108 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957108

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: VariableResolver 'user' not found error

by javidjamae

One thing that I found was that you have to have a seam.properties file in your EJB jar file. For this example (the registration example) it will just be an empty file. If you don't put the seam.properties file in place, you will get those conversion errors. If turn on debugging and look in the console you will see that seam cannot find the user component. That is because it was never instantiated and bound into SEAM. And thus, it cannot be resolved when it is looked up. I don't fully understand why you have to have a seam.properties file when it is empty, but I'm sure there is a logical reason. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957106#3957106 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957106

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB/JBoss] - JBoss or Not

by techguru2006

After reading several blogs online, I am still not able to decide if I should be using JBoss(instead of tomcat) in following scenerio: I am working on an online learning application in which about 8,000 users will be taking online test every day. Two key load activity involved are: 1. Generate and load "all" test problems to client browser[about 300K sise data transferred to client for each test taker] 2. Submission of all answers by user at the end of test Any inputs ? Thanks MJ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957104#3957104 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957104

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: TreeCache/Hibernate/JBossAS optimistic locking problem

by steve.ebersole＠jboss.com

as for your point #2, the *only* time a call should ever get routed through writeLoad() with a null source is a collection cache. There is a hole in our test suite regarding optimistic caches in conjunction with collection caches because I had not intended to apply optimisitc locking to the collection cache regions. So this may be an issue; I'll add a test and see what happens... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957103#3957103 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957103

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: TreeCache/Hibernate/JBossAS optimistic locking problem

by steve.ebersole＠jboss.com

Now, Hibernate is currently bundling an older version of TreeCache. Perhaps something changed in newer versions which caused this to start failing View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957102#3957102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957102

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: TreeCache/Hibernate/JBossAS optimistic locking problem

by steve.ebersole＠jboss.com

Here is the test to which I refer, which works (from the Hibernate test suite): | public void testNoVersioningProvided() throws Throwable { | // note : mimic query cache interactions... | Fqn fqn = Fqn.fromString( "org/hibernate/querycache" ); | TreeCache treeCache = ( ( OptimisticTreeCacheProvider ) sfi().getSettings().getCacheProvider() ).getUnderlyingCache(); | | Long long1 = new Long(1); | Long long2 = new Long(2); | | Option option = new Option(); | option.setFailSilently( true ); | | try { | System.out.println( "****** General put... *******************************************" ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.begin(); | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM1", long1, option ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.commit(); | System.out.println( "****** General put... *******************************************" ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.begin(); | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM1", long2, option ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.commit(); | | System.out.println( "****** General put... *******************************************" ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.begin(); | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM2", long1, option ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.commit(); | | // try puts outside scope of transaction... | System.out.println( "****** No-txn put... *******************************************" ); | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM1", long2, option ); | System.out.println( "****** No-txn put... *******************************************" ); | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM2", long2, option ); | | // actual processing in handling a cached query | System.out.println( "****** actual query cache put logic ****************************" ); | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.begin(); | if ( treeCache.get( fqn, "ITEM3", option ) == null ) { | // run the query, then put... | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM3", long1, option ); | } | System.out.println( "****** actual query cache put logic ****************************" ); | if ( treeCache.get( fqn, "ITEM3", option ) == null ) { | // run the query, then put... | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM3", long1, option ); | } | DummyTransactionManager.INSTANCE.commit(); | | // actual processing in handling a cached query (no txn) | System.out.println( "****** actual query cache put logic ****************************" ); | if ( treeCache.get( fqn, "ITEM3", option ) == null ) { | // run the query, then put... | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM3", long1, option ); | } | System.out.println( "****** actual query cache put logic ****************************" ); | if ( treeCache.get( fqn, "ITEM3", option ) == null ) { | // run the query, then put... | treeCache.put( fqn, "ITEM3", long1, option ); | } | } | finally { | try { | treeCache.remove( fqn, "ITEM1", option ); | treeCache.remove( fqn, "ITEM2", option ); | treeCache.remove( fqn, "ITEM3", option ); | } | catch( Throwable ignore ) { | } | } | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957101#3957101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957101

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: How do I configure this type of logging????

by askesis

This is what I added: | <filter class="org.jboss.logging.filter.TCLFilter"> | <param name="AcceptOnMatch" value="true"/> | <param name="DeployURL" value="MuntpostDevServer.ear"/> | </filter> | Sorry for the inconvenience View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957100#3957100 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957100

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: How do I configure this type of logging????

by askesis

Hi Jaikiran, This still shows *all* output of JBoss in the new file, not just from the package "myPackage" and all the classes in the package. Adding reduces the clutter, but it still shows stuff from JBoss and I only want thing from my MyApplication.ear that are from my myPackage... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3957098#3957098 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3957098

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user July 2006