August 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: When can @Logger be used?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

"appendix" wrote : First of all, thank you all for the info! You have been really helpful. | | Are there any more advantages except the shorter syntax of @Logger over apache.commons.Log? I still feel like using the latter aproach, since calls to the constructor and entity bean can be logged as well. | | Regards, Kurt | The other advantage is that you get EL interpolation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3967000#3967000 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3967000

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Beginners Corner] - Re: Error while trying to get no. of threads using twiddle.b

by PeterJ

Twiddle documentation is at http://docs.jboss.org/jbossas/jboss4guide/r2/html/ch2.chapter.html, about a third of the way down the page. Why are you using port 8877? Did you change the JNDI port for JBoss? Usually it is 1099, in which case you don't have to provide it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966999#3966999 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966999

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Calling Seam Components (Stateless EJB) outside Seam app

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

This looks like a bug in the CVS version of Seam: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-338 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966998#3966998 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966998

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: swimlane user assigment seems to doesn't work

by antitrust1982

yes, I know, me too. I know just that is this line anonymous wrote : graphSession.saveProcessInstance(pi); which give me this error. If i erase it it works well. perhaps it's why in my next jsp I can have the context, because the save context doesn't work. :$ I don't know. thank you for your help antitrust1982 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966997#3966997 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966997

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Isolated ClassLoading in JBoss 4.0.4.GA

by skidvd

Hello, I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this question ... I also tried the Tomcat forum without success ... please let me know if there is a better forum for this question. Anyway, I'm attemtping to achieve isolated classloading for individual war based applications (without much success) in a JBoss 4.0.4GA environment. I understand that these issues have changed since at least the 3.x days as well as perhaps yet again since the 4.0.2 days from what I have found in the wiki at http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ClassLoadingConfiguration. Anyway, I am hoping to have entirely self sufficient (they use ONLY the classes they contain in WEB-INF/classes and WEB-INF/lib and do not or conflict with anything else on the parent classloaders) war applications that do not use anything such as the MyFaces and log4j libs from the parent classloaders. From the wiki, I have tried the following. Here is what I have in my: jbossweb-tomcat55.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml: false false <attribute "FilteredPackages">org.apache.commons.logging In each war I have added a WEB-INF/jboss-web.xml with the following content: <jboss-web> <class-loading java2ClassLoadingCompliance="false"> <loader-repository> dot.com:loader=unique-archive-name <loader-repository-config>java2ParentDelegation=false</loader-repository-config> </loader-repository> </class-loading> </jboss-web> However, this is not providing isolation for me (as adding MyFaces and/or log4j jars of different versions to my WEB-INF/lib causes conflicts symptomatic of non-isolated class loading). Am I missing something unique in 4.0.4 or otherwise missing something? How can this desired behavior be achieved? TIA! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966995#3966995 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966995

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Partial load of data for DataTable

by wjmca

We are trying to do the same thing and just aren't getting something, any chance you can provide your before and after code snippets... Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966994#3966994 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966994

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JNDI/Naming/Network] - Re: urgent naming problem

by PeterJ

Please post the exception and stack trace. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966993#3966993 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966993

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: best practices with pages.xml

by sjmenden

Thank you for the response, so I should be able to use pull-style MVC like in the Blog example. However, in that example, the BlogService is Stateless, hopefully employing it as Stateful will be with minimal pain. However, in the BlogService, there is no @Factory used, just the @Unwrap. Which method would you recommend? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966992#3966992 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966992

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Authentication-strength for access control

by falke2006

Hello, I have been searching information about the possibility to use the information about the authentication method a client has used to authenticate against the server... to use this information for a decision about the redirect to e.g. a Portlet Page. Example: There is a Portlet instance within a Portal Page that is accessed by the user that requires at least a client-certificate. But when the user has been challenged for authentication before, he was logged in using form-based authentication. Now the user should be challenged again, due to the fact of his low authentication strength. === Is there any possibility to set (and read at runtime) a required auth-strength for Portal resources? I could not find such a thing in the documentation but I know that it exists e.g. in the Apache WebServer. Furthermore, is there maybe an extension to handle the described scenario? Many thanks for any contribution!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966991#3966991 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966991

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Does clustering require traffic over 1098 as well as 118

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

The traffic will go over whatever interface the HA-JNDI service is configured to use (which is typically an external interface, as HA-JNDI is used by clients). I wouldn't say this was by design; it's more a side effect of using RMI. To make it go away you would need to: 1) Configure HA-JNDI to use the internal interface (set the BindAddress attribute in the HA-JNDI section of cluster-service.xml.) Obviously this is only an option if you don't have external clients that need HA-JNDI. 2) Prevent exchange of internal interface RMI stubs for clustered EJBs: a) Use the PooledInvokerHA instead of the JRMPInvokerHA for clustered EJBs. Simplest is to edit conf/standardjboss.xml looking for occurences of <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=jrmpha</invoker-mbean> and replacing them with <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=pooledha</invoker-mbean> OR b) Configure the JRMPInvokerHA (in cluster-service.xml) to use the internal address (set the "ServerAddress" attribute.) Again, this is only an option if you don't have external clients that need the EJBs. There is a JIRA for 5.0 to convert HA-JNDI to use Remoting, which will remove the RMI issue for that service. For 5.0 clsutered EJBs already use Remoting. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3966990#3966990 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3966990

19 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user August 2006