August 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Portal] - Re: User Input Req for 2.6 Usability and UI enhancements

by roy.russo＠jboss.com

In response to many of the ideas proposed in this thread, we have created some mockups for the community to view/digest on what we have planned, regarding usability and user-level personalization of the portal. You can view the wiki page here: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Portal_UI Feel free to continue commentin on this thread about these issues. We want your feedback! Note: Usability issues for the bundled admin portlets are still being addressed. Expect a similar wiki page soon, that addresses these. We will also be redoing all bundled portlets with a consistent look and feel. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964109#3964109 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964109

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: Lazy loading for OneToOne association (entities share th

by hoomey

Hi, I'm experiencing exactly the same problem. In a bidirectional 1:1 relation the owned entity gets eagerly loaded even though it has a LAZY fetch type defined.. So far I was unable to figure out a working solution, but I came across the following: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/cayhorstmann/archive/2006/06/the_innermost_s... This seems promising, as well as the article mentioned there: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/jpa/howto/java-se-u... I'm going to give it a try tomorrow, hope it helps... BR, hoomey View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964108#3964108 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964108

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Resume Pageflow after Conversation Timeout

by connerjohn

"petemuir" wrote : Surely you will have lost all the data associated with the pageflow at this point (e.g. any updates to entities will be lost) so the pageflow would have to start again? I agree. However, shouldn't the data from previous steps be saved in the database (I'm not doing anything with transactions to delay saving) automatically by Seam. But beyond that, what I'm looking for is the ability to specify an action method to execute instead of the no-conversation-view-id. I am using the no-conversation-view-id now and redirecting to an action in pages.xml which executes an SFSB method and then returns an outcome for a new *.xhtml page. However, it would be a lot better and more contained if I could just specify the action in the pageflow definition itself - similar to the no-conversation-view-id. Right now I am just restarting the pageflow in the pages.xml action. However, for the right pageflow process, the SFSB method called could be smart enough to "setup" the conversation state (and entirely up to the developer to make sure the state was restored correctly). The example I am working through is a shopping cart checkout process. If the user is on page3 (e.g., filling out the credit card info) and they get distracted and leave the computer for an hour, the conversation on the server times out (or maybe the server got restarted). Then, I currently send them back to the beginning (which is to login) of the pageflow using no-conversation-view-id. However, my pageflow is such that I could "restart" the pageflow if I could call a method that would load the Cart from the database which in this usecase would be all that is required to re-initialize the SFSB state. I would then like the last node to be displayed (in this example page3.xhtml). Ideally I would display some type of FacesMessage and the data would be populated on the form based on what they submited. Now the user would have to re-enter the information on page3 and submit; but they do not have to re-do the entire pageflow up to that point. Some might argue that the user should have to login if they have not be active for a period of time. I agree; but this time period is longer than a conversation timeout. And then what about server reboots - albiet that is probably an edge case that hopefully doesn't occur very often - but all the edge cases is what makes programming interesting. Just some food for thought, --jc View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964107#3964107 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964107

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal 2.4 with JBoss AS 4.0.4.GA plus ejb3

by bmhardy

I installed JBoss 4.0.4.GA zipped version. I was able to install the EJB3 package. version 8 didn't seem to work, but R6 did. I saw errors when I tried to install the portal binary version on the app server after EJB3 was installed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964106#3964106 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964106

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Eclipse IDE (users)] - Re: server started but Server view still says starting...

by rob.stryker＠jboss.com

I will probably add a preference / checkbox that allows that server's state to be automatically set to 'started' after the timeout is reached. Thanks for your help. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964105#3964105 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964105

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: retry fails with form based authentication woth custom l

by ppradhan

Dear cgriffith A million thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I was indeed pointing the container to the login form even when user was authenticated. I was using sendRedirect () in my error page to go back to the login form. Once I changed that to jsp:forward , things work perfectly. -Padmaja View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964104#3964104 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964104

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Bean access

by urswag

How have I to call the categoryManager bean. I should call method before the data model is loaded into the table. With the following construction anonymous wrote : | | xhtml @69,119 binding="#{categoryMangager.updateAssortmentCategories}": Target Unreachable, identifier 'categoryMangager' resolved to null | | I get the error anonymous wrote : | | <h:dataTable var="category" binding="#{categoryMangager.updateAssortmentCategories}" value="#{assortmentCategories}"> | <h:column> | <h:outputLink value=""> | <h:outputText value="#{category.description}" /> | </h:outputLink> | </h:column> | </h:dataTable> | | The bean code part anonymous wrote : | | @Stateful | @Scope(SESSION) | @Name("categoryManager") | @Interceptors(SeamInterceptor.class) | public class CategoryManagerBean implements Serializable, CategoryManager { | | ... | | public void updateAssortmentCategories() { | | if (assortment != oldAssortment) { | Query query = em.createQuery("from Category c where c.assortment = :assortment"); | query.setParameter("assortment", assortment); | assortmentCategories = query.getResultList(); | oldAssortment = assortment; | } | } | | ... | | } View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964103#3964103 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964103

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JCA/JBoss] - Expose underlying ResultSet from WrappedResultSet

by jieshengz

Hi, I modified the com.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedResultSet to expose the underlying ResultSet One method is added. ----------------------------------- public ResultSet getOriginalResultSet() { return this.resultSet; } ----------------------------------- I do not think this is useful to others. However, I post this modification in case someone also need this function. Bound by LGPL license, I need to publish my modification. I attached the whole modified file here. Someone from Jboss can decide whether to add this to main stream code. -jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964102#3964102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964102

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: LoginAction - Understanding Second Part?

by connerjohn

"petemuir" wrote : ....but why this design decision I'm not sure... Thanks! I guess I'm asking about the design reasoning? What is the purpose of calling the method but not the rest of the chain? Thanks again, --jc View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964101#3964101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964101

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Eclipse IDE (users)] - Re: server started but Server view still says starting...

by mazz＠jboss.com

OK, I think that probably answers the question. I don't think the JMX remote adapter service is deployed in my particular server instance. How would this support such a deployment? I'm assuming if this needs the remote JMX adapter to be deployed, and its not, then it will never know that the server is started. Perhaps you should have a timeout such that after, say, 5 mins or whatever, you flip the state to "Started" and in your log you indicate "timeout before twiddle could determine the state; assuming server is up". Also, what if the remote adapter is deployed, but its secured such that you need a username/password to connect? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3964100#3964100 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3964100

19 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user August 2006