I looked around in the code, and scrollableDataGrid definitely uses its own DataModel class (org.richfaces.model.ScrollableTableDataModel, extending org.ajax4jsf.model.ExtendedDataModel which itself extends javax.faces.model.DataModel -- the base class for Seam's DataModel stuff).
So the question is: does Seam want to ease the use of scrollableDataGrid like it does with dataGrid? If so, then some modifications to Seam will need to be done to allow that.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4095657#4095657
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4095657
When watching my debug statements the listener method was being called after the action method. Not being a complete expert on the JSF lifecycle is this a Seam issue or a JSF issue. Where would you recommend I look first?
I would have thought the listener method being called after the action method was a JSF issue, which makes it even harder to fix.
I'm using Seam 1.2.p1 and myfaces 1.x.
Thoughts,
Chris.....
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4095655#4095655
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4095655
first of all thx for the speedy answer.
Maybe i'm missing something really obvious here, but in which version exactly is this supposed to be fixed? It does not appear to be working in 2.0.0.CR2. I've just downloaded the latest nightly build and tried to use that, but with this version my application doesn't even deploy any more (due apparently to something completely unrelated which I really don't have the time to investigate) and the code in UISelectItems does not seem to have significantly changed between the nightly build and the 2.0.0.CR2 version.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4095649#4095649
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4095649
Andrea,
I just tested it, and for the head of the JBC trunk at least, setting a Option with setCacheModeLocal(true) before the putForExternalRead call prevents replication for that call. So, JBC exposes an API to allow the behavior you want.
If you want this behavior for Hibernate's use of JBC as a 2nd level cache, then you need to post a feature request on the Hibernate project. This could be controlled on a per-SessionFactory basis via a Hibernate configuration property. Configuring it on a per-entity type would be a lot more complex, if it's doable at all.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4095646#4095646
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4095646
Your jboss-web.xml should specify the context root as "/" for apps deployed to a virtual host.
| <?xml version="1.0"?>
| <!DOCTYPE jboss-web>
| <jboss-web>
| <context-root>/</context-root>
| <virtual-host>orangeadomicile.fr</virtual-host>
| </jboss-web>
|
You will want to make sure that you secure your web-console and jmx-console as well. When you setup your virtual hosts in jboss, these are accessed by http://{IP_ADDRESS}/web-console/.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4095645#4095645
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4095645
I found a Bug in Seam and It's not fixed in the Version 2. If the MockFacesContext was created by the ExceptionFilter in the "endWebRequestAfterException" method this faces context is still there after the call FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().release(). If another WebApplication gets this "unclean" thread and ask for a FacesContext he gets the wrong context and the application may crash.
Please implement in the MockFacesContext the release method as follow:
@Override
public void release() {
setCurrentInstance(null);
}
Thanks
Alex
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4095643#4095643
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4095643