February 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: problem with having factory in home

by codelion

>From an implementation point of view it is logical. >From the point of view of who is the intended audience, probably people looking for an easy way of coding, the advice in the reference doc to use that factory too easily leads to surprising results. Throwing a curveball? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020139#4020139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020139

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: compare dates (urgent help, please)

by jbmp user

Some idea!!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020136#4020136 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020136

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Best practice for deployment: updating database schema

by micho

Hi, I used the "update " variant in the persistence.xml . I detected, that som things wont work with this option, for example, uniqueconstrains are not created correctly. For development the "create-drop" variant works fine. Deploying the application I have to update the schema in several databases. Is there a best practice how to do that. can hibernate create database scripts for the updates? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020135#4020135 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020135

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss Portal 2.6 Alpha 2 Release

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: relationship does not prevent from deleting referenced e

by micho

Thanks a lot for the help. In the DB there are no foreign keys. Inspecting the Database, I saw, that the tabletype is MyISAM whitch I think doenot support foreign keys. How can I tell Hibernate to create the tables with type innodb? I tried dropping the tables. The uniqueconstraint, which wasn´t working before now works correct, the referential integrity not. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020132#4020132 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020132

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: IntelliJ Idea project for JBoss Portal 2.6

by bdaw

1) the cleanest way is to create a multimodule project in portal sources dir and then manually add all .iml files as new modules to the project 2) we don't build portal inside intellij - we just edit sources there and build using command line and ant scripts 3) the issue you have with build.sh is probably because you have java installed in "Program Files" (directory with space in name). Yes I know it sucks... Just try using plain ant (call ant command in "build" directory) or move java to better location if you want to invoke ant with .bat scripts. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020131#4020131 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020131

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: IPC WindowActionEvent getParameters()

by jonnydscott

If I use seperate classloaders for the sar I get the following: | Caused by: javax.management.InvalidAttributeValueException: Set attribute has class class $Proxy141 loaded from org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt$2@fc9074 that is not assignable to attribute class interface org.jboss.portal.core.event.PortalEventListenerRegistry loaded from org.jboss.mx.loading.UnifiedClassLoader3@fac2be{ url=file:/home/jboss/jbossas/jboss-4.0.3SP1/server/uat/tmp/deploy/tmp60673RSBArea6.sar ,addedOrder=95} | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanAttributeInterceptor.checkAssignable(ModelMBeanAttributeInterceptor.java:214) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanAttributeInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanAttributeInterceptor.java:73) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.PersistenceInterceptor.invoke(PersistenceInterceptor.java:61) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74) | at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.setAttribute(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:442) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.setAttribute(MBeanServerImpl.java:593) | at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.setAttribute(ServiceConfigurator.java:665) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020130#4020130 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020130

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Feature request - @InOut

by mariuszs

Maybe @Bi is better ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020129#4020129 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020129

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging] - Re: Configuring Destinations

by timfox

IIRC JMS is basically a LCD (lowest common denominator spec) that was basically written to unify the two forms of messaging prevalent at the time by the two main messaging providers- fast non persistent publish subscribe - as used by Tibco and point to point queues as used by IBM MQ series. I believe the spec was basically written by IBM. I think you'll have an extraordinarily hard time getting agreement on another JMS spec. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020127#4020127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020127

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: One node in two clusters?

by chrismeadows

I've almost achieved what I need by using TcpDelegatingCacheLoaders. The configuration I have is: Cluster 1 has two nodes A and B replicating using UDP. Cluster 2 has two nodes C and D replicating using UDP. A, B, C, D all use unshared cacheloaders Clusters 1 and 2 cannot find each other Node A has a chained TcpDelegatingCacheLoader, delegating to a TcpCacheServer that wraps node D Node C has a chained TcpDelegatingCacheLoader, delegating to a TcpCacheServer that wraps node B Now what happens is that a single cache change is continually propagated in a loop, typically A->C->B->D->A, because A does not know that the update incoming from D originated from A (A and D are in separate clusters). I think I'm close to what I am trying to achieve; can anyone fill in the miss bits? Can the data packets be given UUIDs so that A can ignore packets that it created? Also, it looks like the true tag is ignored for the TcpDelegatingCacheLoader View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020124#4020124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4020124

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2007