February 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Error testing Hello World BPEL on JBoss 4.0.5

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

"crussell42" wrote : I was getting something similar and needed to point my runtime classpath at jboss/client jars. | | SO Here was the fix to make sure the jboss/client/*.jar is in classpath first. Is that so? Looking at examples/common/ws-build.xml, the run-test target references a test.path defined near the top of the file: <path id="test.path"> | <path refid="jboss.path" /> | <pathelement location="${common.classes.dir}" /> | <pathelement location="${output.classes.dir}" /> | </path> In turn, jboss.path points to the jboss client jars: <path id="jboss.path"> | <pathelement location="${common.config.dir}" /> | <fileset dir="${jboss.home}/client" includes="*.jar" /> | </path> To me, it looks like the jdk1.5 xml apis were not endorsed properly. If you look at jboss/lib/endorsed/xml-apis.jar, the QName class there has a serialVersionUID equal to 4418622981026545151. Conversely, in jdk1.5 it is -9120448754896609940. Hence the client and server classes are different. Meghana, what directory did you copy the endorsed jars to? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013207#4013207 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013207

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Problem seam in clustering( conversationEntries??)

by genman

Here is an interesting, related bug report: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29346 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013205#4013205 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013205

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Problem seam in clustering( conversationEntries??)

by norman.richards＠jboss.com

Just to be sure, I ran a few of the Seam examples against a clustered profile and had no problems. You'll have to examine the components you are putting into the conversation/session to determine which one has non-serializable values. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013200#4013200 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013200

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: Repeated calls to LoginModule for EJB authentication

by brownjamese

Anil: By cache are you refering to the cache maintained by JaasSecurityManagerService? ... configured through (in JBossAS 4.0.4GA) /deploy/security-service.xml? .. with the default configuration: | !-- JAAS security manager and realm mapping --> | <mbean code="org.jboss.security.plugins.JaasSecurityManagerService" name="jboss.security:service=JaasSecurityManager"> | <attribute name="ServerMode">true</attribute> | <attribute name="SecurityManagerClassName">org.jboss.security.plugins.JaasSecurityManager</attribute> | <attribute name="DefaultUnauthenticatedPrincipal">anonymous</attribute> | <attribute name="DefaultCacheTimeout">0</attribute> | <attribute name="DefaultCacheResolution">0</attribute> | </mbean> | The reason I ask is that we are encountering the same issue with a custom login module that extends AbstractServerLoginModule implementing only initialize, and login. Thus allowing the super's commit and logout to handle things. -- James View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013199#4013199 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013199

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam no longer compatible with facelets 1.0.14?

by andrew.rw.robinson

We cannot upgrade facelets due to the fact that 1.1 breaks backwards compatibility. I deleted that class and rebuilt the jars for 1.1.6 and it seems to work. Is email the only thing that will be broken without that class? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013198#4013198 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013198

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam security adds default messages

by fernando_jmt

I think an empty message will generate the <h:messages> also renders an empty message. I think it would be better detects if "org.jboss.seam.loginSuccessful" is in the messages.properties, if it exists then add the message, if doesn't exist, don't add the message. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013196#4013196 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013196

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB/JBoss] - Solved!

by kstrunk

I solved my problem. The problem was that my Java IDE (idea) started a redeployment automatically when I started the JUnits tests. So there were no beans I could access. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013195#4013195 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013195

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: problem when using new Fqn with Integer

by genman

The file cache loader does not support integers in FQN. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013194#4013194 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013194

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Migrating from 1.1.1 GA 2 1.1.6. Problem with injection

by Jump

I'm an idiot. Plz drop this topic. I fogot 2 uncomment <core:jbpm/> in components.xlm View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013193#4013193 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013193

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam no longer compatible with facelets 1.0.14?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

It is used for rendering email. My recommendation is to update your facelets version. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013192#4013192 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013192

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2007