Hi --
I'm a little bit confused, because i have 2 independent jsf-portlets on a single portal page. Each portlet has 2 input fields and action butons for executing some java code.
If i fill the text fields of my 2 portlets and i execute the action of one of them, i often see that the input fields of the other portlet are reset after this action. It looks like the portlet session (and the backing bean) of the other portlet is reinitialized. Is it a normal behaviour of my portlets. Is it possible to setup jboss portal ,so that portlet sessions are not influenced by other portlets actions? I don't want to loose the values into the backing bean of the passive portlet.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011232#4011232
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011232
I have a jbpm jdpl like this
| <task-node name="game1">
| <event type="node-enter">
| <action expression="#{game1.start}"/>
| </event>
| <task name="game1" >
| <assignment actor-id="#{actor.id}"/>
| </task>
| <transition name="" to="game2"></transition>
| </task-node>
|
I need to start a task automaticaly on node-enter calling a method game1.start. I try by annotate this method with @StartTask but i get an exception
| no value for request parameter: taskId
Can I pass taskId to the method, or i need something else in the start method.
Help!!! :-)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011228#4011228
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011228
Hi there,
In the new .NET platform there is a new workflow engine. The engine has several types of worklows, sequential workflow, state worklfow, and I forgot some.
To me a workflow is definitely different from a state machine. JBPM seems to be a true workflow solution, and not a state machine. Is this correct? State machines definitely have its purpose, is JBPM in need of a sibling?
Rgrds,
Sanne
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011227#4011227
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011227