February 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: request parameter gets ignored sometimes

by codelion

I only got the idea to do it that way because of shorter syntax promised in seam_reference, in chapter 10.2 Home objects, "adding a @Factory". If I think of what a factory normally does, how contexts normally work, etc. then of course it seems I should stick with carHome.instance. Now, having fallen into that trap, and now knowing to stick to using carHome.instance, what will happen with that chapter 10.2 suggestion to use a factory for shorter syntax? Will the recommendation to use a factory be removed? Will it get a use warning? Or will Seam be changed to allow some shorter syntax to work in more/all cases? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4011004#4011004 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4011004

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: request parameter gets ignored sometimes

by fhh

You are accessing two different objects: One is the car created by the factory method and then outjected into whatever scope you declared. The other is the member variable of the CarHome object. Since the last one is not outjected the scoped object is not replaced. I'm just guessing. I have never used the home objects and you did not post your code. Regards Felix View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010984#4010984 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010984

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Dojo Integration

by fhh

anonymous wrote : | IMO, there really should be a dojofaces project which provides JSF versions of the Dojo wiidgets, effects etc. | Have you had a look at the jMaki project? Regards Felix View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010983#4010983 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010983

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: WS Eventing client - basics question

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Yes, tell us what you have come up with when it's working... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010973#4010973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010973

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: JBossWS 1.2.0CR2 with JEMS 1.2 (and JBoss 4.0.5) fails

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Sorry, i think that was complete BS. What mode are you using? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010972#4010972 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010972

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: JBossWS 1.2.0CR2 with JEMS 1.2 (and JBoss 4.0.5) fails

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

This looks to me as if the client uses default names for wrapped parameters but the service impl uses named ones. It it a doclit/wrapped service? How did you create the client artefacts? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010971#4010971 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010971

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Web services and stateful session

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Dwin is right. WS-Addressing is the right way to build conversational web services. Take a look at the user guide and the corresponding samples. It contains an example for a staful service. It's already supported for quiet some time now: http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbossws/user-guide/en/html/wsaddressing.html IMO passing the serialized handle around is not a good idea. I could picture a SLSB facade instead that keeps a UUID->Handle registry and delegates to the SFSB beans behind the scenes. You could hand out the UUID using WS-Adressing and internally rely on the ejb handle. You could even offer a simple API for clients to resign from their sessions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010969#4010969 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010969

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Conversational(initiator=true) when immediate=true

by norman.richards＠jboss.com

What behavior would you expect from initiator=true in pages.xml? Which component should be considered the initiator? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010965#4010965 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010965

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Accessing generated PDFs

by norman.richards＠jboss.com

Ok - done. You are now getting an org.jboss.seam.pdf.DocumentData. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010962#4010962 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010962

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - VMware instances would help newbies / evaluation process

by jimisola

Hi, I've haven't been able to find VMware instances of recent JBoss Portal versions. Are there any for 2.4 or, better yet, 2.6 alpha? The only one I found was "Complete JBoss/Eclipse Integrated Development Environment" (http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/362). It would be very helpful if VMware instances of JBoss Portal (for use with VMPlayer) were made available. A VMware instance would easy the process of evaluating JBoss Portal and JBoss AS a lot. Hopefully, that would result in more users as more people will try it out. Regards, Jimisola View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4010958#4010958 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4010958

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2007