February 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam Email - IllegalStateException: No Factories configu

by petemuir

anonymous wrote : And, I found that even if the classloader inside FaceletsRenderer is the WACL then the UCL may be used to initialise facelets. Oops, no, thats not right... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022164#4022164 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022164

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Event scoped stateful session bean and passivation

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Thats a pretty fair assumption (though there are a couple of tiny windows). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022163#4022163 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022163

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam Email - IllegalStateException: No Factories configu

by petemuir

So, I've run into this (in anger) as well now. 1) Facelets scans the classpath for .taglib.xml files inside of META-INF, and loads them if it finds them (thats what all the load implicit stuff you see is). 2) The UCL doesn't scan WEB-INF/lib (as this is a special war thing). So, if you get the UCL instead of the WebAppClassLoader then it don't work. And, I found that even if the classloader inside FaceletsRenderer is the WACL then the UCL may be used to initialise facelets. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022160#4022160 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022160

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Event scoped stateful session bean and passivation

by flashguru

Is it correct to assume that stateful session bean with scope event will never be passivated when using TransactionalSeamPhaseListener? This is because the stateful session bean will be considered in a transaction and therefore it will prevent the EJB3.0 container from passivating it? The rule of not passivating an SFSB when it is in a transaction is mentioned in the EJB3.0 spec (page 63). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022158#4022158 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022158

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging] - Re: 1.2.0.CR1 transparent node failover does not always work

by ovidiu.feodorov＠jboss.com

We've been testing like crazy lately, and we found some bugs with failover. I might release a CR2 this night, in case you want to give it a spin. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022154#4022154 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022154

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: How can I use a EJB Query with this?

by chrismalan

Hi Dornus, There are two solutions I can think of. The first side-steps an EJB query. One of class A's attributes will be a collections of some sort of class B. Simply get an instance of class A by primary key, get an instance of the collection of Bs and do a bees.size(). The second is to do a join. Something like select ab from A as a join a.b as ab where a.PrimaryKey=PK and then again a size() on ab. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022152#4022152 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022152

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging] - Re: 1.2.0.CR1 transparent node failover does not always work

by bander

anonymous wrote : I am trying to understand why you're example uses an exception listener to catch exceptions, and recreate the connections etc? In this case it's because I'm reusing a test case I created for an issue in 1.0.1. :) We're also working with the assumption that an error on the connection is likely to be infrequent and in most situations will signify that something unrecoverable has happened i.e. it will be safer to just start over. This assumption may be invalid - I'm open to any better/more sensible/more standard way to do it. Our code also needs to work with other JMS providers that don't have transparent failover. We've got production sites using Oracle JMS (which is really just the JMS API wrapped around their Advanced Queues DB functionality) but smaller potential customers don't want to pay $$$ for Oracle. So, we've been evaluating the Open Source alternatives i.e. JBoss Messaging, Active MQ, Open JMS, Sun Messaging. JBoss is one of the more attractive options because paid support is available. Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022151#4022151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022151

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Booking authenticator vs. Seamspace authenticator

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Actually I would prefer if they were both STATELESS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022144#4022144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022144

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Booking authenticator vs. Seamspace authenticator

by flashguru

I noticed that the authenticator implementation in the booking example is stateful session bean with scope event, while the seamspace authenticator is POJO. Any specific reason why? Or was is simply a matter of taste? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022135#4022135 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022135

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - jBpm setup

by royn＠rco.com

On an xp workstation I installed the following items. eclipse 3.2.2 installed at c:\eclipse jbpm-starters-kit-3.1.4.zip installed under c:\jbpm jbpm-gpd-site-3.0.zip in \ibpm When I do an example similar to the following url address http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3/gpd/firstprocess.html I get figure 2.3 but with 12 errors. The import org.jbpm cannot be resolved (4) The import junit cannot be resolved Testcase cannot be resolved to a type Action Hanlder cannot be resolved to a type.... I must have missed a step and I am now missing a path and/or files. Any suggestions would be appreciated. thanks, roy View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022132#4022132 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022132

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2007