Does anyone know if configuring these 2 products to interact is different for a Windows environment vs a Unix/Solaris environment?
I have an app that is working perfectly on my PC but when we deploy to our Unix/Solaris machine, we continue to get the following Exceptions being thrown during JBossAS startup and when deploying the application
javax.jms.JMSException: Error creating the dlq connection: wsmq not bound
javax.jms.JMSException: Could not create
a session: javax.resource.spi.CommException: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException:
wsmq not bound
Any help appreciated
Brian Holzer
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4044811#4044811
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4044811
What's the syntax to make a bean annotated with @Startup depend on a second bean. For example, I have two beans:
| 1. StartupValidationBean
| 2. ReleaseLocksBean
|
|
| I want to do something like this:
|
| | @Startup(depends={my.package.ReleaseLockBean})
| | public class StartupValidationBean {
| |
| | @Create
| | public void beginValidation() {
| | // get reference to ReleaseLockBean
| | releaseLockBean.releaseAllLocks();
| | }
| | }
| |
|
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4044806#4044806
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4044806
Yes it is possible, it just depends on where the request originates. We currently have:
* JBPM
* EJB MDB (JMS works on 4.0.5, other JCA doesn't)
* EJB timers
* WS (in CVS)
* JSF (for completeness)
Otherwise, you *should* be able to apply the principle to another request - you just have to set up and clean up the Seam contexts yourself - this is obviously harder for stateful than stateless requests (you just have EVENT and APPLICATION scope for free, no session).
HTH
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4044805#4044805
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4044805