[JBoss Seam] - Re: Trinidad / ajax4jsf doesn´t work anymore in Seam 1.2.0
by salar118
I've used trinidad,seam1.2,ajax4jsf,myface in one of my projects. As I test my project on jetty by using mvn jetty:run command, it works well but if i deploy my project (war file) into jboss, it gives me following message:
[STDOUT] 2007-07-05 20:39:23,023 ERROR [org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener] - <Error initializing ServletContext>
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Class org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.NavigationHandlerImpl is no javax.faces.application.NavigationHandler
at org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator.getApplicationObject(FacesConfigurator.java:665)
at org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator.configureApplication(FacesConfigurator.java:587)
at org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator.configure(FacesConfigurator.java:148)
at org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.initFaces(StartupServletContextListener.java:68)
at org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.contextInitialized(StartupServletContextListener.java:51)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3854)
any idea?
Thanks.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060994#4060994
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060994
19Â years
[JBoss Seam] - Re: Does Seam really support back buttoning?
by gavin.kingï¼ jboss.com
anonymous wrote : The problem was that, apparently due to the bug in @Begin(nested=true) as discussed in the other thread, the behavior did not work ...
Yes, thanks for spotting this. I will get it fixed.
anonymous wrote : If Bill continues his postings like today [1], we'll be soon unable to use Seam for political reasons. I don't personally give a shit, but others do.
I don't tell Bill what to do or say. Frankly I find most of the stuff he posts on TSS amazingly intemperate, unpersuasive, unproductive and inflammatory. But then, lots of people violently disagree with stuff I post as well, so who am I to judge others?
It's a deep, ancient cultural tradition at JBoss to let people speak their mind and I'm certainly not going to be the one to try to get us acting more "corporate".
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060993#4060993
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060993
19Â years
[JBoss jBPM] - Re: problems with task assignment
by petia
Thanks Ronald, your reply is very appreciated.
"kukeltje" wrote : every user: the behaviour you see is what is there. This is under discussion between the developers. Has something to do with what we think the main focus of the webconsole should be.....
I did not realize that jbpm-jbpl-suite-3.2.1 is so immature (everyone being able to execute everything...). I will be interested in having a look at it when the design of the webconsole has stabilized a bit more. Until that, I will need to go back to version 3.1.4 and the previous console.
"kukeltje" wrote :
| Second question: The GPD can create forms for you (almost as rapid as runtime doing it ;-)) look at the latest GPD
|
I did not find this functionality in the GPD (and now I do believe I have the latest version of it). Any link to documentation (or an example or any other relevant material on this) is welcome.
"kukeltje" wrote :
| Third question: They do not show up on the page, that is static, if you put the users you created in the correct role (participant is needed!) it should work I think)
OK, I tried that, but it did not help. I also wonder whether this role definition is really needed: a user can be defined without participating in a group and he can be referred to by actor-id (in a task assignment for instance). At least this is according to fig 11.3. Identity model class diagram and chapter 18 in the user guide (and it worked in version 3.1.2).
Anyway, good luck with the further development of the new webconsole (and the whole project course). I will follow the development (and most likely post more questions on this forum).
Kind regards, Petia
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060985#4060985
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060985
19Â years