July 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Does Seam really support back buttoning?

by hkarapuu

"Gavin King" wrote : Not really, other frameworks are wrong here (and unperformant). In Seam, you get effect you want to achieve using "state rollback" by instead using nested conversations. It will take a bit of thinking for you to really "get" this. Yes i got the style, it's in fact same as what i used in my custom implementation of conversation scope in the sense that the state to be saved needs to be marked explicitly. Which is all good. The problem was that, apparently due to the bug in @Begin(nested=true) as discussed in the other thread, the behavior did not work ... I'll give it a spin again and see how things go. Thanks. Ps. If Bill continues his postings like today [1], we'll be soon unable to use Seam for political reasons. I don't personally give a shit, but others do. [1] http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=46065#235878 /Henri Karapuu View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060978#4060978 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060978

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: Configure jboss.bind.address

by PeterJ

Did you try: run -b < ip-address > View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060977#4060977 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060977

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: concurrency of conversation-scoped components

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

1. process==JVM 2. No idea what you're trying to say here. The thread blocks when it attempts to restore the conversation, not when it hits the SFSB. There should be zero diff between your two test methods, it blocks before it even gets to the test method. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060975#4060975 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060975

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: Configure jboss.bind.address

by pavel.orehov

On linux it ./run.sh -b <ip_address> But what if I am running on windows ? Should I edit the run.bat ? Where ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060973#4060973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060973

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Singe Page Application and Conversations

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

The problem with extremely long-running conversations in Seam is that Seam-managed persistence contexts are bound to the conversation, and will fill up with stale data. It is *possible* to futz with stuff to get a PC-per-nested-conversation, but it wouldn't be that transparent. If you're not using Seam-managed PCs, what you are doing would be OK. A possible solution is to have "per-action" state in a per-nested-conversation SFSB, with an extended persistence context bound to the SFSB. ie. @PersistenceContext(type=EXTENDED) Actually I think that's a good way to do it :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060972#4060972 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060972

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Hot redeployment - internationalization

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Fixed in CVS, please try it out. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060968#4060968 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060968

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal Page Security

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

Make sure you didn't allow recursive-view right on the portal. The page shouldn't show up. (neither the link to it in the menu) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060967#4060967 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060967

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Partnership between JBoss and ActiveEndpoints

by rvsoft

I've read of a partnership between JBoss and ActiveEndpoints for the former to use ActiveBPEL. Does this mean that JBoss no longer intends to keep developing its own BPEL engine? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060966#4060966 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060966

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Portal Page Security

by bertles

First off, I am working with a fresh install of the 2.6-GA AS bundled portal with a MySQL back-end. I created a new portal page with security to only allow admin access. When not logged in, however, I still have access to the page. Shouldn't the portal page access function much like the portlet access where if you don't have access the portlet simply doesn't show up? -JP View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060960#4060960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060960

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Does Seam really support back buttoning?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

"hkarapuu" wrote : anonymous wrote : No. In my opinion this is not the true semantics of "back". Back is purely navigational, it should not change the underlying state. | | I think there are many equally 'correct' or 'true' semantics for back button. | | Other frameworks saying "back button support" mostly implement the other ('state rollback') semantics. Seam's "back button support" is more like separating the context per browser window, right? | | In practice the state rollback semantics has proven to be extremely valuable. | | Would you be open for discussion about adding that as a configurable alternative? Not really, other frameworks are wrong here (and unperformant). In Seam, you get effect you want to achieve using "state rollback" by instead using nested conversations. It will take a bit of thinking for you to really "get" this. Basically what Seam says is that you should be able to freely back-and-forward through a wizard without "losing" state that you already entered. But at certain well-defined points, you "acquire" state that should be released if you back up out of it. (An example of such a point is adding a new "child" object, or something.) These "well-defined points" are the beginnings of new nested conversations. You need to spend some time thinking it out before you really "feel" this approach. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4060958#4060958 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4060958

19 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user July 2007