September 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

by mnrz

what simple :) ok so it has an issue only with auto instantiation and not further benefits. I thought a great usability for that. thank you both for your reply View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080757#4080757 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080757

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address

by kukeltje

shoot, I was hoping you'd select the third option ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080755#4080755 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080755

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - com.arjuna... warning message

by sylobsa

Hi all, I use JBoss 4.2.0 + jBPM 3.2.GA When I start JBoss, I get a lot of warning messages like the following : 10:29:13,890 WARN [loggerI18N] [com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.resources.arjunacore.norecoveryxa] [com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.resources.arjunacore.norecoveryxa] Could not find new XAResource to use for recovering non-serializable XAResource < 131075, 30, 28, 1--3f57fec0:12fb:46dc29bb:2d91-3f57fec0:12fb:46dc29bb:2da9 I note this kind of messages since I use jBPM and JBoss 4.2. What does it mean ? What should I do to avoid them ? Regards A. ROY View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080754#4080754 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080754

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - magic ant build?

by chenjingjing＠hotmail.com

Can anybody explain how project is built? I just wander where the resource files(jsp, lib etc.) come from. and reading the ant file seems too tough to me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080751#4080751 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080751

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Javascript error using Seam Remoting (JMS subscription)

by shane.bryzak＠jboss.com

Is it possible for you to test with the latest CVS version of Seam? I just recently made a change to fix out-of-scope references with Ajax callbacks, which I suspect fixes your error also. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080749#4080749 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080749

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: how to use @Roles?

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

@In(create=true) User user2; etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080748#4080748 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080748

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Problems using ajax validation in seam-gen

by damianharvey

Pete said: anonymous wrote : If concurrent calls occur, Seam queues the action event for a period of time (the concurrent request timeout), if it can't process the event within that period it aborts the call and prints out a FacesMessage telling us this. Pete, if I understand you correctly, then I don't think that this is what is happening. When the period times out it doesn't just abort the call, it ends the conversation. If you compare a Conversation to a Session, you wouldn't expect a Session to expire just because a page couldn't load. As you say in option 3, something like ignoreDupRequests would be handy, but sometimes you may well want the behaviour that Vincent has coded - ie. I want all of my requests to be processed eventually (within reason). Mind you I suppose that could be accomplished with a very long timeout... I've tried increasing the concurrent-request-timeout to 10 seconds and the test page from the previous posts works fine. The calls all get queued and everything is cool and I'm a happy bunny. What are the downsides of increasing this timeout? For instance what is the danger in setting it to a stupidly large number (perhaps equal to the conversation timeout)? Thanks, Damian. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080747#4080747 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080747

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Identity component and support of multiple users

by shane.bryzak＠jboss.com

I guess if you disabled cookies then you would get the kind of behaviour that you described, however this issue is more to do with session management than security, and we would not make any changes to the security API to support this kind of thing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080746#4080746 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080746

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: <ui:insert /> stopped working in Seam 2.0 within source

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

FYI Mike and I discussed this end of last week, and he said he hoped there would be one soon once a couple more issues are resolved. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080745#4080745 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080745

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: s:graphicImage and images being shared by users!

by shane.bryzak＠jboss.com

I had the same issue in one of the Seam examples, however I've fixed the problem in CVS so if you could try the latest version it might fix your problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080743#4080743 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080743

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user September 2007