September 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JCA/JBoss] - Re: JBoss 4.0.4 java.sql.SQLException: No more data to read

by ashishanand

I've found the cause of the problem. It happens because of we are using Oracle world lexer (setting) for indexing. If the index is deleted or the option is changed from world lexer to basic lexer it works fine. In Oracle 10g (10.2.0.1.0) using world lexer option for creating index will cause this problem. The indexer fails when there is a lot of text to be indexed, the amount of text... I cannot say for sure. (about 10 pages of text). Regards, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080732#4080732 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080732

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - An HQL question ...

by sylobsa

Hi all, I use JBoss 4.2.0 + jBPM 3.2.1 + Hibernate 3 with a PostgreSQL 8.2.4 database. I'd like to perform an HQL query which could generate the following SQL query : select name_, version_ from jbpm_processdefinition d1 where not exists (select name_, version_ from jbpm_processdefinition d2 where d2.name_ = d1.name_ and d2.version_ = d1.version_ +1) Is there a way to do that ? select d1.name, d1.version from ProcessDefinition d1 where not exist (select d2.name, d2.version from ProcessDefinition d2 where d2.name = d1.name and d2.version = d1.version+1) doesn't work. Regards A. ROY View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080731#4080731 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080731

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - @LocalBinding lib

by begimot

I want to find where the lib (maven dependency), containing LocalBinding annotation, can be found? Mostly the name of the lib. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080730#4080730 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080730

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Re: attach javascript to jpdl generated task form save butto

by rossputin

Hi, I tested with jbpm-jpdl-3.2.1 out of the box, on tomcat 5.0.28 connected to mysql 5.0.37 on a Mac, I double checked the save and end task behaviour, I will put this in Jira, thanks for your help Ross View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080729#4080729 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080729

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] - Re: EJB 2.1 and 3 coexisting?

by wolfc

Yes. Make sure you're using AS 4.2.1.GA, if so bring on the exceptions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080728#4080728 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080728

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB/JBoss] - Re: problem connecting to EJB3

by alexsbe

I found someone how have exaclty the same problem. here is the link : http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-823 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080727#4080727 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080727

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Microcontainer] - Re: How do I programmatically declare a JNDI name dependency

by wolfc

"alesj" wrote : But why is another lookup issued? Because the EJB 3 injection framework itself doesn't know about MC. It only knows the JNDI name. I could change this to kernel.getRegistry().getEntry(name) but that would just mean another lookup. (Note: the (JNDI) registry should never cache, because I might actually want a new SFSB.) "alesj" wrote : And what's the deal with those exceptions? At some point someone is asking for the HAPartition bean which is also a JNDI context, so the context is returned instead of the bean. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080726#4080726 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080726

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: how to use @Roles?

by mnrz

any other idea? :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080725#4080725 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080725

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Cannot find child element - with namespace

by jmaasing

We've switched to document/literal on the JBoss side (and changed the WSDL accordingly) and now it works. But as omatzura says, the first attempt was rpc/literal and I do not see why it didn't work on the JBoss side. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080724#4080724 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080724

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Problems using ajax validation in seam-gen

by vincent.latombe

Pete: thanks for your explanations, I think I have a clear and complete understanding of the situation now. See my comments inline. Now, my parallel processing stuff is a bit rusty, but looking at ReentrantLock, and at Vincent's patch, I think it, is the equivalent of setting an infinitely long concurrentRequestTimeout - so that requests are delayed indefinitely until they can be scheduled. It is exactly what I intended to do. "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | So - what can we do to make this better? | | 1) Document this (much) better based on discussions in this thread | That would be a good stard. But even with better documentation, there is a need for a better control of these timeout problems. "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | 2) Make it easier to set the concurrentRequestTimeout on an action by action basis e.g. | | @ConcurentRequestTime(5000) | | public void doSomething() {} | It's interesting, but won't really solve the flooding problem. As far as I understood the code, the timeout is constant, not depending on the number of calls waiting for conversation lock. And does this timeout represents the amount of time the call must wait before failing, or is it the amount of time we estimate this call should take? I think the second option is better. A method should declare how much time it typically takes to execute, so that if a new call occurs, it can wait for this time. By extension, if we have n calls waiting and we've got a n+1-th call coming, this new call must take into consideration all timeouts defined by previous calls and sum them up, to determine the amount of time it should wait. "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | 3) Provide something equivalent to ignoreDupRequests (so that multiple concurrent calls to the same method can be discarded). | That would be great too to prevent flooding cases more easily "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | 4) Make it easier to disable the warning message on a per request basis - it really means one thing if your conversation times out as you were idle (in this case you want something like "Sorry, you were idle too long and your workspace has been lost") and something completely different if you have a concurrent request timeout ("Sorry, you are swamping the server, please slow down!") | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4080721#4080721 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4080721

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user September 2007