November 2009 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[Beginner's Corner] - protect HTTP INVOOKER JBOSS 4.2.3.ga

by erasmomarciano

Hello what should i do to protect the servlet JMXInvolerServlet? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265819#4265819 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265819

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM 3.2.6.SP1 enterprise environments question

by kukeltje

yes, an interceptor is an option. you could also wrap it in an annotation. I've done this and now I think of it I'll write a short blog about it later this week. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265809#4265809 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265809

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache Users] - Injection into the custom interceptor

by SKabashnyuk

I have a question about using custom interceptors. Is it possible to inject object into the custom interceptor using @Inject annotation? My interceptor code look like this: | public class MyInterceptor extends CommandInterceptor | { | | ...... | @Inject | public void inject(InterceptorParameter interceptorParameter) | { | ..... | } | .... | } InterceptorParameter class defined as : @NonVolatile | public class InterceptorParameter | { | ... | } Interceptor configured from xml: <customInterceptors> | <interceptor after="org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CacheStoreInterceptor" | class="org.exoplatform.services.jcr.impl.storage.jbosscache.MyInterceptor" > | </interceptor> | </customInterceptors> Interceptor parameter registered through CacheSPI. Cache<Serializable, Object> cache = | factory.createCache(InjectionTest.class.getResourceAsStream("test-custom-interceptor.xml"), | false); | | InterceptorParameter interceptorParameter = new InterceptorParameter(); | ((CacheSPI<Serializable, | Object>)cache).getComponentRegistry().registerComponent(interceptorParameter,InterceptorParameter.class); | | cache.create(); | cache.start(); | Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265807#4265807 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265807

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: JuEL

by sebastian.s

Should be possible: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=163350 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265806#4265806 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265806

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Variable modification restriction + form generation

by juanignaciosl

I miss some data restriction specification at jBPM. I think defining restrictions like "variable x can only be modified at task A" it's quite neccesary. The "task forms" feature could be an option, but I don't actually want to open jBPM console to final users. I think I'm going to implement a variable-task permission matrix plus an automatic form generation in order to do this, but it's hard to believe there's nothing already done... Any ideas? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265805#4265805 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265805

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re:

by camunda

Hi Juan. I think it is a good idea NOT to model all the backward transitions. Unfortunetely there is no out-of-the-box way of undoing (means rolling back a business transaction) at the moment. And some things have to be considered, like compensating actions and the like. There was a discussion about it already a couople of times, but if I am right, it is not yet built in. We always implemented it project specific if required. Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265798#4265798 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265798

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Messaging Users] - Re: Ordered Redelivery of Messages

by glutters

"gaohoward" wrote : In jbm 1.4, we provide a 'ordering group' feature to guarantee the ordering of message delivery. Please read the user guide for details. | Ok, you provide the ordering of message delivery, but you also guarantee the ordering when the provider starts REdelivery. I mean, the provider should send again the messages when some message is lost on the consumer side , Do this messages mantain the producer ordering? Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265797#4265797 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265797

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: jBPM 3.2.6.SP1 enterprise environments question

by Olivier_Debels

We are using a jboss interceptor for this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265793#4265793 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265793

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - "undo" / rollback a transition

by juanignaciosl

My clients are interested in being able to undo a transition or going backwards in a process instance. Is it possible to do it somehow? They don't want to be told to model every backwards transition... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265791#4265791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265791

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - JuEL

by bestage

Does anyone know if it is possible to use a different EL implementation instead of JuEL? We have found compatibility problems with the IBM WebSphere Server 7.0. At the moment it seems that we cannot use jbpm4 with WAS 7.0 because of JuEL. This would be a real showstopper. Has anyone else run into the same problem? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4265788#4265788 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4265788

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2009