[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: jboss-javaee.jar dont find classes javax.servlet
by BjPenn
hey jaikiran, sorry i dont know why it's so hard to make this run , i guess moving from glassfish to jboss is no that obvious.
Noiw i am having another issue, in my main app i include a jar wich belong to another java project that i developed , this project , when it was runing on glassfish i had to include in the library the jsf jars and javaee.jar too, now moving to jboss, i copied the jar's in the jboss lib folder that covers all the classes needed and i added them to the project, and guess what?? the log is full of errors, even though i make my classpath to point on jboss libraries folders, this is so freaky!!!! any clue about this??
thanks
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221216#4221216
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221216
17 years
[JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: putForExternalRead doesn't solve our problem
by manik.surtani@jboss.com
"jshowalter" wrote :
| - "if all of the data in a node ages out of the cache due to LRU, is the data removed from the cache and the node left in place, or is the node also removed"?
|
Like I said, the unit of atomicity is a node. So, it is an entire node that times out due to LRU, not any specific key/value pair within a node. As such, eviction removes the entire node *unless* the node has children, and is needed as a structural mechanism to access those children. In the latter case, the node is emptied and flagged as being evicted, but the node itself is still left as a structural piece.
"jshowalter" wrote :
| - "but you do introduce the possibility of phantom reads (but this is allowed in R_R semantics anyway)." We're using READ_COMMITTED. That should prevent phantom reads, shouldn't it?
Nope. :-)
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/sdbc/TransactionIs...
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221201#4221201
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221201
17 years