September 2009 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM Users] - Re: JBPM 4.x using Sybase ASE 11/12 on Jboss 5.1.0GA

by kukeltje

phew..... hahaha.... The only thing I can think of is that the reporting uses a different connection and accompanying configuration then you and I think it does. But I don't have any knowledge in that area. As mentioned before, You might have more luck in the console forum View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255529#4255529 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255529

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JCA] - Re: Bug in connection validation code

by bortx

aren't you going to say anighing about this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255527#4255527 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255527

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Security] - Re: jboss5: credentials get lost when creating jms connectio

by lvonk2000

Upgrading to messaging 2.0.0-beta4 as described in the URL you posted indeed solved the issue. Thanks a lot! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255526#4255526 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255526

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: JBPM 4.x using Sybase ASE 11/12 on Jboss 5.1.0GA

by HelloW

Scratch that - IE finally succumbed and threw the error again. Yeah I agree...it doesn't make sense. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255521#4255521 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255521

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: workflow design about wait states

by kukeltje

The aggregator is the join, but the 'concept' is non-blocking in the technical level. The thing is that when you start a process, it continues to the first node that is a waitstate and returns the control to the user then. In normal cases this is the jBPM fork. In your cases you'd want that to be the join, or even the 'leaving the join (e.g. the end node) In general it is an interesting question, although we should not try to duplicate things that are already in JBoss ESB. Since afaik a blocking scatterer/gatherer is available in the ESB. Implementing a custom join (look at the source of the JoinActivity.java (http://fisheye.jboss.org/browse/~raw,r=5490/JbpmSvn/jbpm4/trunk/modules/j...) with e.g. a Thread.sleep(..) and removing the 'waitForSignal()' would make it blocking but could have other implications. So in the end, I think you implementing a Thread.sleep(..) for now is best I think. But do not forget to e.g. implement timer like in the link I gave you. For this specific use-case, jBPM does not provide what you need out of the box and in the end you have to do some similar things like you would with old-school multi-threading or using jms for this (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0802_nas...) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255519#4255519 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255519

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: SMTPAppender

by rodedh

Woops :-)... I configured an SMTPAppender I enabled SMTPDebug and from the logs I always see that an attempt to create connection via localhost, 25 isSSL false occurs. No need to mention that I am using a SMTPHost attribute which is not localhost... I dont find where this behavior can be changed. Here is my appender: | <appender name="EMAIL" class="org.apache.log4j.net.SMTPAppender"> | <param name="SMTPHost" value="smtp.gmail.com" /> | <param name="From" value="fromUser(a)gmail.com" /> | <param name="To" value="toUser(a)gmail.com" /> | <param name="SMTPDebug" value="true" /> | <param name="SMTPUsername" value="username" /> | <param name="SMTPPassword" value="password" /> | <param name="Subject" value="webapp error" /> | <layout class="org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout"> | <param name="ConversionPattern" value="[%d]%n%n%-5p%n%n%c%n%n%m%n%n" /> | </layout> | <filter class="org.apache.log4j.varia.LevelRangeFilter"> | <param name="LevelMin" value="ERROR"/> | <param name="LevelMax" value="FATAL"/> | </filter> | </appender> | Thanks, Rod View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255512#4255512 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255512

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Users] - Re: workflow design about wait states

by mmusaji

"kukeltje" wrote : So you want a front-end thread to be blocking for (mostly) parallel executed jobs in the backend? Ar you sure? How long will these jobs be running? Is the process fully ended after these jobs like in your definition that was posted? | | So basically http://www.eaipatterns.com/BroadcastAggregate.html is what you want? | The jobs will be running for different periods of time but anywhere between 2 and 8 seconds. But there could be problems with comms etc and it could take longer or we could retry etc so the job would take longer in them circumstances. And yes... unfortunately we are sure! lol. But yes that pattern looks spot on. Is there an "Aggregator" of sorts in JBPM? Or would that be the Join node in a way. "kukeltje" wrote : | And I assume there are multiple return variables since having multiple parallel jobs working on the same variable is kind of dangerous. | Yes multiple return variables (each fork changing its "own" object) which is then read back at the front-end once its been updated. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255509#4255509 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255509

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache Users] - help regarding the standalone transaction manager

by ratna

Hey, i am new to jboss cache Plz any one can help me on how to jboss cache without any JTA. My application runs in stand alone mode without any app or web server. if possible plz privide me bit of sample code & configuration. Thanks in advance, Ratna View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255504#4255504 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255504

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Beginner's Corner] - Re: What are the advantages of Jboss compared to Glassfish

by jaikiran

"Wolfgang Knauf" wrote : | the problem might be that a lot of users don't know both (I don't know Glassfish, too ;-) ). | | That's exactly one of the reason why i usually don't participate in similar threads. "EUROKEY" wrote : | And why sould I use JBoss instead if Glassfish. I mean if there are advantages it could make sense. You will find many who will favour JBoss and many others who will favour Glassfish and each server has its own list of advantages and shortcomings. The bottom line is - always use the software which you feel is right for accomplishing your task :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255503#4255503 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255503

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: SMTPAppender

by Wolfgang Knauf

Hi Rod, having to search your appender in the page source code is not fair ;-). Please repost it and wrap it in "[ code ]" tags. The preview your post before submitting. Best regards Wolfgang View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255502#4255502 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255502

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user September 2009