January 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM] New message: "Re: [jBPM 4.3] Database Version Issue between 4.2 and 4.3"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "[jBPM 4.3] Database Version Issue between 4.2 and 4.3": http://community.jboss.org/message/519214#519214 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Nils, This is indeed a bug. The thing that bothers me, is that we have CI set up exactly to check these kind of bugs ... Tom is going to investigate what went wrong this release. Thanks for the issue post! -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519214#519214

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: [jBPM 4.2] - Finding Currenty Activity"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "[jBPM 4.2] - Finding Currenty Activity": http://community.jboss.org/message/519210#519210 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- No. The correct operation you want is through the Execution interface: Set<String> findActiveActivityNames() Whenever you see **Impl appearing, it means that you're doing something the API didn't forsee. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519210#519210

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: jBPM v3 - short transactions"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "jBPM v3 - short transactions": http://community.jboss.org/message/519208#519208 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- No, what I meant was that when you do a signal() operation, the method will return immediately. But you don't know where exactly your process will be next time you do an operation, since the process is handled asynchronously (in a separate thread) -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519208#519208

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Error changing value of Lob variable at jBPM 4.x"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Error changing value of Lob variable at jBPM 4.x": http://community.jboss.org/message/519206#519206 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Which database are you using? When does this error happen? Do you have a test case? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519206#519206

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: How create table from bean?"

by Wolfgang Knauf

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "How create table from bean?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519205#519205 Author : Wolfgang Knauf Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/WolfgangKnauf Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, the check for existence of a table can be performed by executing a SQL query. The query depends on your DBMS. For e.g. Oracle, this might be: select count(*) from all_tables where owner = 'ME' and table_name = 'MY_TABLE'; The table could be created by executing a simple "create table" statement. But I think you have to provide more details on your use case: why does a bean have to create a table for another bean? Also keep in mind that in a production environment, the app should not have the rights to do DDL. Hope this helps Wolfgang -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519205#519205

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: how to use Timers on <custom> in jBPM 4.2"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "how to use Timers on <custom> in jBPM 4.2": http://community.jboss.org/message/519203#519203 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Ronald is 100% correct. I've added Ronalds test case to the jBPM testsuite and adapted the XSD as needed. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519203#519203

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: async frok with java actions (4.2)"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "async frok with java actions (4.2)": http://community.jboss.org/message/519202#519202 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- What exactly happens in the java code in the automatic handlers? The use case you describe is covered in the test case org.jbpm.test.activities.ForkJoinInSameTransactionTest (see test testForkToJoinWithActivitiesInOneTransaction), so I don't think it's a bug. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519202#519202

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM won't save data in the database"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM won't save data in the database": http://community.jboss.org/message/519201#519201 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Indeed, you don't need to open the environment yourself (this is done for all the API calls that you can use on the services). Only when you start writing your own command service stack (advanced stuff!), then you need to manage the environments yourself. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519201#519201

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: jBPM-4.2 Remote API problem?"

by Joram Barrez

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "jBPM-4.2 Remote API problem?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519200#519200 Author : Joram Barrez Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jbarrez Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- And what if you name your remote command service as 'txRequiredCommandService' ? The NPE happens because it can't find this command service in your config, so explicitely naming it could do the trick. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519200#519200

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Assign a task to a special user and a group"

by Christian Kloy

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Assign a task to a special user and a group": http://community.jboss.org/message/519199#519199 Author : Christian Kloy Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/c.kloy Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hello together, I want to assign a task to a special group, ok no problem, it works with a "candidate-group". But we want, that a special user of this group get this task as first and the whole group only, if he reject the task. The xml-schema allows both, assignee and candidte-groups for the element task. But the sql-statement say something like this: "is in groups an assignee is null". Is there a way, to do this with jbpm? jbpm-version: 4.3 Best regards Christian -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519199#519199

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2010