[jboss-user] [IronJacamar] - Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin
Jesper Pedersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the
discussion
"Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin"
To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/581354#581354
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. The method of ManagementRepository.getInstance() is not declared
as static, it should be, right?
Ok, that class was wrong - see https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-492 JBJCA-492 - the
first couple of fixes have been committed.
There is one ManagementRepository per JCA container, so the class isn't static but
must be injected into the code that needs it - or there must be a service that keeps a
reference to it. Same idea as the MetadataRepository class.
2. Has the ManagementRepository been used already to register
deployments when deploying some resources?
That part was missing for the standalone/embedded. It has been fixed as part of
JBJCA-492.
3. RHQ is Server/Agent architecture, which means it is possible that
the agent plugin will work in another JVM than the jca container one. Shall the
IronJacamar RHQ plugin work only in the embedded jopr environment which does not require
remote access or work in the RHQ HA environment also which will require remote access to
the jca deployments?
Lets start with EMBJOPR and go from there.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/581354#581354]
Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 4.4 KB)