Clebert, thanks so much for the pointers. You are correct, the default configuration in
beta3 does not contain either the in-vm connector or the acceptor. After adding both, the
exception went away.
Just out of curiosity, is this intentional? I would prefer that the default configuration
worked right out of the box. I know JMS, but having to learn about acceptors, connectors
and configuration is yet another impediment for noobs to adopt JBM. In any case, JBM 2.0
is looking like a great product in the making. Keep up the good work!
Thanks.
Naresh
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4241873#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...