[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: How to install a bean without affecting unrelated bean's

"alesj" wrote : | You don't know if it's really (un)related until you tried it. | How else would you know that beanX is not related to beanY | Isn't this possible by just checking the dependencies of beanX? "alesj" wrote : | The recursion shouldn't be too big, since if bean has no real dependencies, it's moved to installed on first attempt, hence not hugely involved anymore in context state changing/checking. | I need to explain this a bit more :) The (MC) bean (=proxyfactory) has no real dependencies. Infact the question is not really about dependencies. Its more of a single install triggering a recursive installation of all other (unrelated) contexts that are available in the controller. The controller recursively installs these based on *states* and not because those are any dependencies of the bean being installed: // This one resolves all the contexts by State. So if there are N number of contexts in | // the ready to start state, their state will be incremented even if they are not | // real dependencies of the original context that was passed for "install" | protected boolean resolveContexts(ControllerState fromState, ControllerState toState, boolean trace) | { | boolean resolutions = false; | Set<ControllerContext> unresolved = contextsByState.get(fromState); | Set<ControllerContext> resolved = resolveContexts(unresolved, toState, trace); | if (resolved.isEmpty() == false) | { | for (ControllerContext context : resolved) | { | Object name = context.getName(); | if (fromState.equals(context.getState()) == false) | { | if (trace) | log.trace("Skipping already installed " + name + " for " + toState.getStateString()); | } | else if (installing.add(context) == false) | { | if (trace) | log.trace("Already installing " + name + " for " + toState.getStateString()); | } | else | { | try | { | if (trace) | log.trace("Dependencies resolved " + name + " for " + toState.getStateString()); | | if (incrementState(context, trace)) | "alesj" wrote : | And 300+ should be the number we can handle ... Right now not :) The application that i attached is bare minimal in terms of dependencies within the beans. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219890#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...