[jboss-user] [JBossWS] - "ArrayOf" parameter types generating BindingExceptions

I am using a "Top Down" (aka wsdl-to-java) approach to create a JSR109 endpoint with JBossWS 1.2.1.GA. The WSDL that was provided to me contains things like: | <s:complexType name="FieldSelection"> | <s:sequence> | <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" name="FieldName" type="s:string" /> | <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" name="Values" type="tns:ArrayOfString" /> | </s:sequence> | </s:complexType> | <s:complexType name="ArrayOfString"> | <s:sequence> | <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="string" nillable="true" type="s:string" /> | </s:sequence> | </s:complexType> | My wstools-config.xml is: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <configuration xmlns="http://www.jboss.org/jbossws-tools"> | <wsdl-java location="services.wsdl" parameter-style="bare"> | <mapping file="mapping.xml" /> | </wsdl-java> | </configuration> | Running the wstools Ant task finishes without a problem. Both the code and mapping document are generated without error. However, when I deploy the service and try to invoke it I get a BindingException saying that the ArrayOfString class cannot be found. Upon inspection of the generated classes there isn't a ArrayOfString.java file nor any references to a ArrayOfString object in FieldSelection.java. FieldSelection uses the actual array type "String[]". When I look at the mapping.xml I see this: | <java-xml-type-mapping> | <java-type>ArrayOfString</java-type> | <root-type-qname xmlns:typeNS='http://www.domain.com/projname/services'>typeNS:... | <qname-scope>complexType</qname-scope> | <variable-mapping> | <java-variable-name>string</java-variable-name> | <xml-element-name>string</xml-element-name> | </variable-mapping> | </java-xml-type-mapping> | When I remove this snippet from the mapping.xml everything works fine. Is this appropriate behavior? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4055761#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...