"alesj" wrote :
| There might not be the modification type you're looking for.
| But it's easy to add what ever you want. ;-)
|
Yah, I looked at that too. Though, that requires extending the ModificationType
enumeration and registering a ModificationAction. Non-trivial to try out a different
ModificationAction, it would seem.
Perhaps a ModificationType.ATTACHED and go looking for a ModificationAction.class
attachment if set?
"alesj" wrote :
| And I also see types behave as I expected. :-)
|
Yah, I think they all work as expected, just not a complete set from my POV. I did see
some examples with an UNPACK on the root, but that seems to be non-tenable. UNPACK only
works on child context-infos from the look of it. Else, the isNested() check stops it on
the root without doing anything if you point it at the root deployed archive, not a nested
archive.
"alesj" wrote :
| You're welcome to impl "top" == 'I effectively want is just a
top-level un-jarring'.
| And I'll add it to VFS 2.0.1. ;-)
I'll poke around, but I should be able to tell the difference between foo.jar as a
real directory and foo.jar as a mounted vfszip? I can still do a byte-for-byte copy of a
vfszip-mounted JAR?
I'll work on an implementation.
Thanks!
-Bob
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4193896#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...