I'd agree. IName is not a good naming strategy. Name adornment should indicate some
addition or specialization of a class. IName violates this intuitive notion by adding
adornment to the most basic/simplest form of the class - the interface.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4006552#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...