I agree that these definitions are internal implementation details, that change with the
wind. If we treated them as an API, then we would have to ensure backward compatibility,
and that would really restrict us.
I also agree that user configuration does not belong in our MC beans, that instead should
be relegated somewhere else. Potentially this could be the which is also used for the
ProfileService persistence mechanism.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230896#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...