[jboss-user] [JBoss AOP] - Different jboss-aop.xml files for unit testing

Hi All, As mentioned in my previous post I'm reviewing AOP for use with unit testing. I define my jboss-aop.xml in test/META-INF folder in my eclipse project. I have noticed that it is going to be quite probable that poincut definitions are going to cause undesired side-effects. For instance - if you consider the test code | @Test | public void testCreateObject() { | try { | man.createObject(ap); | } catch (Exception e) { | fail("Test failed since exception was thrown: " + e); | } | } | | @Test | public void testCreateObject_MultefileException() { | try { | man.createObject(ap); | fail("Should have thrown MultefileException"); | } catch (Exception e) { | | if (!(e instanceof MultefileException)) { | fail("Test failed since exception was not MultefileException: " + e); | } | } | } then the jboss-aop.xml | <bind pointcut="execution(public $typedef{persistenceHelperTypeDef}->new(java.lang.String))"> | <interceptor class="com.ecebs.unittest.aop.interceptor.GenericInterceptor"> | <attribute name="mockObjectName">MockPersistenceHelper</attribute> | </interceptor> | </bind> | | <typedef name="persistenceHelperTypeDef" | expr="class($instanceof{com.ecebs.unittest.aop.IPersistenceHelper}) | AND !class(com.ecebs.unittest.aop.mock.*)" /> | | <aspect class="com.ecebs.unittest.aop.aspect.ExceptionInjector" /> | <bind pointcut="execution(public void com.ecebs.unittest.aop.AOPUnitTestManagerBean->createObject(..))"> | <advice name="throwMultefileException" aspect="com.ecebs.unittest.aop.aspect.ExceptionInjector" /> | </bind> The first entry in the jboss-aop.xml file mocks-out a persistence helper. The createObject test would then pass. When I add the subsequent aspect and bind to inject an Exception - every time createObject is called - the first test obviously then fails - which I appreciate is exactly what I would expect to happen given the way I have set this up!! Is there a way; via the pointcut definitions or by changing which jboss-aop.xml file is used, to overcome such an issue? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4217811#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...