[jboss-user] [IronJacamar] - Re: ResourceAdapter.start

Stan Brown [http://community.jboss.org/people/traffic] created the discussion "Re: ResourceAdapter.start" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/572584#572584 -------------------------------------------------------------- So this will be new behavior for JBoss application server 6 – JBoss 4 and 5 call start followed by the setResourceAdapter calls on the MCF and ActivationSpec?  ironjacamar-1.0.0.Beta3 (or a subsequent beta) will become part of JBoss AS 6 or will only a standalone container be supported for version 1.6 of the connector architecture? This has never been an issue with any application server – I admit I've never tried Geronimo, but WebLogic, GlassFish, WebSphere, and the Oracle Application Server call start followed by the setResourceAdapter calls.  Just getting started with the WebSphere 8 beta, so maybe it too performs as ironjacamar. So this will be new behavior for JBoss application server 6 – JBoss 4 and 5 call start() followed by the setResourceAdapter calls on the MCF and ActivationSpec?  ironjacamar-1.0.0.Beta3 (or a subsequent beta) will become part of JBoss AS 6 or will only a standalone container be supported for version 1.6 of the connector architecture? This has never been an issue with any application server – I admit I've never tried Geronimo, but WebLogic, GlassFish, WebSphere, and the Oracle Application Server call start followed by the setResourceAdapter calls.  Just getting started with the WebSphere 8 beta, so maybe it too performs as ironjacamar. Again thanks for your time. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/572584#572584] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]