This is not a bug, it's normal and appropriate canonicalization of XML. With the
exception of dropping the charset attributes, all of these items are legitimate XML
transformations which should not affect the behavior of any compliant XML parser. The two
example fragments you describe are completely equivalent (again, other than the missing
attribute).
p
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983738#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...