Ove Ranheim [
http://community.jboss.org/people/oranheim] created the discussion
"EJB 3.1 and evil StaticMetamodel"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/569405#569405
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
Timely, Java 6 got rid of XML through Annotation and stuff. As a Weld / CDI user I love
it. After searching Google I don't find many people complaining about
@StaticMetamodel. The new way to describe your meta-model. This doesn't seem thought
through from my perspective, since most meta data is already described. What's the
point and why do I have to re-constitute my data model in order satisfy CriteraBuilder.
Am I on the wrong track here?
What's the point? This to me seems like a wrong path, as it's in the code,
already!?
How come I get have to move from bloated XML code to bloated Annotated code?
Why?
Cheers
PS! Why not make a way to encompass anomalies of already existing code.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/569405#569405]
Start a new discussion in EJB3 at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]