"alesj" wrote : Why would we have something like this in MC?
Isn't it MC which knows how to treat that the "jndi:" prefix defines a
dependency upon a JNDI entry?
Otherwise it's just some magic string?
S,
ALR
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197274#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...