[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Clustered local interfaces? Really?

Hi guys, I ask awfully lots of questions recently but bear with me. I found something truly weird. I wanted to see what happens if I declare local interface as clustered in jboss.xml. I did not expect that it would work just like remote. Does anyone have an explanation? the only thing which is different was logging. At startup JBoss told me: [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] *** EJB 'WorkAddress' deployed as CLUSTERED but not a single clustered-invoker is bound to container *** but after that my EJBLocalHome and EJBLocalObject work as if they were cluster-aware EJBHome and replica-aware EJBObject. Any ideas??? Here is my code. I did <ejb-name>WorkAddress</ejb-name> <local-jndi-name>WorkAddressLocal</local-jndi-name> true then started two nodes in JBoss with sticky OFF. I do servlet->SessionFacade (Stateful Session Bean)->Local statefull session bean (my WorkAddressLocal) My session facade has 2 instance variables, reference to EJBLocalHome and reference to EJBLocalObject. I initialize them when my Session Facade is called the first time. After that I store Session Facade bean in the session. Second requests comes around and gets load-balanced to the other node. Over there I successfully recover my Session Facade which has 2 references and test both of them: test LocalHome //workAddressHome was created earlier in ejbCreate WorkAddressLocal bean = workAddressHome.create(); bean.test(); //success test EjbLocalObject //workAddressLocal was created earlier in ejbCreate workAddressLocal.test();//success also ! .... Many thanks if anyone who can shed some light on the matter View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4066369#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...