"otaylor" wrote :
| I don't know why the asynchronous replication of putFailFast() was added
orginally, but my assumption is that it's about increasing concurrency and
performance. Replicating cache fills synchronously doesn't increase correctness, so
you might as well do it synchronously.
|
Asynchronously, you mean (the last instance). Precisely. Using sync replication for this
call doesn't buy you anything.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3977569#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...