What problem sare you running into?
2.0 is a big API change from the 1.x series, not just for PojoCache but for TreeCache as
well. In terms of API, this should not change again so writing against the 2.0 API is
what I'd recommend.
Regarding the PojoCache vs TreeCache debate, I'd go with the "simpler code"
option as well, and use PojoCache.
That said, I don't see why you need to serialize your beans to use TreeCache? You
could just put the objects directly in TreeCache, the only difference is that the entire
object will be replicated rather than the object being broken down into primitives.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4028355#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...