Thanks for you comment, Tom. I am basically going the route you suggest. I do a simple
conversion and see what else I need to take into account.
Luckily we are using BPM in a very light weight way - basically we use it as state machine
and message pipe only. We do not use any Vitria rights management and only one business
object. Everthing else happens outside of Vitria.
I am currently working on a proof of concept. I plan to
- replace the corba/messaging mechanism used for client/server communication with
WebService. Currently 'events' which are actually method calls are sent over the
message channel.
- On the server side I use a BPM management object to process the 'events' and
mimic what Vitria currently does.
That way I do not need to change the interface to Vitria that is currently used.
Hopefully, once the transition is done we can start using BPM the way it is intended ;-).
THX,
Bernhard
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971444#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...