Lin Gao [
http://community.jboss.org/people/gaol] created the discussion
"Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/581184#581184
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, Jepser:
Thanks for the information. :)
Some questions:
Yes, all deployments in the IronJacamar container should be
registered with the ManagementRepository singleton. The IronJacamar management model is
independant of the technology used, like JMX or RHQ.
1. The method of ManagementRepository.getInstance() is not declared as static, it should
be, right?
2. Has the ManagementRepository been used already to register deployments when deploying
some resources?
3. RHQ is Server/Agent architecture, which means it is possible that the agent plugin will
work in another JVM than the jca container one. Shall the IronJacamar RHQ plugin work
only in the embedded jopr environment which does not require remote access or work in the
RHQ HA environment also which will require remote access to the jca deployments?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/581184#581184]
Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]