Morning, I have an issue with jboss-seam-2.0.0.BETA1. I have an all-on-one CRUD page where selecting an item in the table reloads the current page and populates the create/edit form in another div. If the page.xml has <begin-conversation join="true"/> then the form will not be populated (ie. the form field values are not set). If I remove the <begin..>, then it works (the form field values are populated with the data from the selected table row). A conversation isn't required for my example page, however I have some more complex pages where one is. The same behaviour was not present in Seam 1.2.1GA. I have tried this with a sample app Seam-Gen'd using both Seam2.0.0 and also with Seam1.2.1. My example form PersonList.xhtml: <!DOCTYPE composition PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" | "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | | <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" | xmlns:s="http://jboss.com/products/seam/taglib" | xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" | xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" | xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" | xmlns:a="https://ajax4jsf.dev.java.net/ajax" | xmlns:rich="http://richfaces.ajax4jsf.org/rich" | template="layout/template.xhtml"> | | <ui:define name="body"> | <h:form id="person" styleClass="edit"> | <rich:panel> | <f:facet name="header">Edit Person</f:facet> | | <s:decorate id="personidDecoration" template="layout/edit.xhtml"> | <ui:define name="label">personid</ui:define> | <h:inputText id="personid" | required="true" | disabled="#{personHome.managed}" | value="#{personHome.instance.personid}"> | <a:support event="onblur" reRender="personidDecoration" bypassUpdates="true"/> | </h:inputText> | </s:decorate> | | <s:decorate id="firstnameDecoration" template="layout/edit.xhtml"> | <ui:define name="label">firstname</ui:define> | <h:inputText id="firstname" | required="true" | size="50" | maxlength="50" | value="#{personHome.instance.firstname}"> | <a:support event="onblur" reRender="firstnameDecoration" bypassUpdates="true"/> | </h:inputText> | </s:decorate> | | <s:decorate id="lastnameDecoration" template="layout/edit.xhtml"> | <ui:define name="label">lastname</ui:define> | <h:inputText id="lastname" | required="true" | size="50" | maxlength="50" | value="#{personHome.instance.lastname}"> | <a:support event="onblur" reRender="lastnameDecoration" bypassUpdates="true"/> | </h:inputText> | </s:decorate> | | <div style="clear:both"> | <span class="required">*</span> | required fields | </div> | | </rich:panel> | </h:form> | | <rich:panel> | <f:facet name="header">Person search results</f:facet> | <div class="results" id="personList"> | <rich:dataTable id="personList" | var="person" | value="#{personList.resultList}" | rendered="#{not empty personList.resultList}"> | <h:column> | <f:facet name="header"> | personId | </f:facet> | #{person.personid} | </h:column> | <h:column> | <f:facet name="header"> | firstName | </f:facet> | #{person.firstname} | </h:column> | <h:column> | <f:facet name="header"> | lastName | </f:facet> | #{person.lastname} | </h:column> | <h:column> | <f:facet name="header">action</f:facet> | <s:link view="/PersonList.xhtml" | value="Select" | id="person"> | <f:param name="personPersonid" | value="#{person.personid}"/> | </s:link> | </h:column> | </rich:dataTable> | | </div> | </rich:panel> | | </ui:define> | | </ui:composition> | My PersonList.page.xml: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <page xmlns="http://jboss.com/products/seam/pages" | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | xsi:schemaLocation="http://jboss.com/products/seam/pages http://jboss.com/products/seam/pages-2.0.xsd"> | | <begin-conversation join="true"/> <!-- the line that causes my hair-loss --> | <param name="personPersonid" value="#{personHome.personPersonid}"/> | | </page> | Has the way that conversations are treated changed between 1.2.1 and 2.0.0? Nothing in the changelog.txt rings any bells. I have looked at the debug output but can't spot anything that would cause this behaviour. I can upload this sample app (both versions) if anyone would like to see it. Thanks, Damian. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063402#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...