5:13 a.m.
Morning,
I have an issue with jboss-seam-2.0.0.BETA1.
I have an all-on-one CRUD page where selecting an item in the table reloads the current
page and populates the create/edit form in another div. If the page.xml has
<begin-conversation join="true"/> then the form will not be populated (ie.
the form field values are not set). If I remove the <begin..>, then it works (the
form field values are populated with the data from the selected table row).
A conversation isn't required for my example page, however I have some more complex
pages where one is.
The same behaviour was not present in Seam 1.2.1GA. I have tried this with a sample app
Seam-Gen'd using both Seam2.0.0 and also with Seam1.2.1.
My example form PersonList.xhtml:
<!DOCTYPE composition PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
|
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
|
| <ui:composition xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
| xmlns:s="http://jboss.com/products/seam/taglib"
| xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
| xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
| xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
| xmlns:a="https://ajax4jsf.dev.java.net/ajax"
| xmlns:rich="http://richfaces.ajax4jsf.org/rich"
| template="layout/template.xhtml">
|
| <ui:define name="body">
| <h:form id="person" styleClass="edit">
| <rich:panel>
| <f:facet name="header">Edit Person</f:facet>
|
| <s:decorate id="personidDecoration"
template="layout/edit.xhtml">
| <ui:define name="label">personid</ui:define>
| <h:inputText id="personid"
| required="true"
| disabled="#{personHome.managed}"
| value="#{personHome.instance.personid}">
| <a:support event="onblur"
reRender="personidDecoration" bypassUpdates="true"/>
| </h:inputText>
| </s:decorate>
|
| <s:decorate id="firstnameDecoration"
template="layout/edit.xhtml">
| <ui:define name="label">firstname</ui:define>
| <h:inputText id="firstname"
| required="true"
| size="50"
| maxlength="50"
| value="#{personHome.instance.firstname}">
| <a:support event="onblur"
reRender="firstnameDecoration" bypassUpdates="true"/>
| </h:inputText>
| </s:decorate>
|
| <s:decorate id="lastnameDecoration"
template="layout/edit.xhtml">
| <ui:define name="label">lastname</ui:define>
| <h:inputText id="lastname"
| required="true"
| size="50"
| maxlength="50"
| value="#{personHome.instance.lastname}">
| <a:support event="onblur"
reRender="lastnameDecoration" bypassUpdates="true"/>
| </h:inputText>
| </s:decorate>
|
| <div style="clear:both">
| <span class="required">*</span>
| required fields
| </div>
|
| </rich:panel>
| </h:form>
|
| <rich:panel>
| <f:facet name="header">Person search results</f:facet>
| <div class="results" id="personList">
| <rich:dataTable id="personList"
| var="person"
| value="#{personList.resultList}"
| rendered="#{not empty personList.resultList}">
| <h:column>
| <f:facet name="header">
| personId
| </f:facet>
| #{person.personid}
| </h:column>
| <h:column>
| <f:facet name="header">
| firstName
| </f:facet>
| #{person.firstname}
| </h:column>
| <h:column>
| <f:facet name="header">
| lastName
| </f:facet>
| #{person.lastname}
| </h:column>
| <h:column>
| <f:facet name="header">action</f:facet>
| <s:link view="/PersonList.xhtml"
| value="Select"
| id="person">
| <f:param name="personPersonid"
| value="#{person.personid}"/>
| </s:link>
| </h:column>
| </rich:dataTable>
|
| </div>
| </rich:panel>
|
| </ui:define>
|
| </ui:composition>
|
My PersonList.page.xml:
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
| <page xmlns="http://jboss.com/products/seam/pages"
| xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
| xsi:schemaLocation="http://jboss.com/products/seam/pages
http://jboss.com/products/seam/pages-2.0.xsd">
|
| <begin-conversation join="true"/> <!-- the line that causes my
hair-loss -->
| <param name="personPersonid"
value="#{personHome.personPersonid}"/>
|
| </page>
|
Has the way that conversations are treated changed between 1.2.1 and 2.0.0? Nothing in the
changelog.txt rings any bells. I have looked at the debug output but can't spot
anything that would cause this behaviour.
I can upload this sample app (both versions) if anyone would like to see it.
Thanks,
Damian.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063402#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...