]
Alessio Soldano updated JBWS-3264:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: jbossws-cxf-4.0.0.Beta2
(was: jbossws-cxf-4.0)
Don't use log4j configuration classes in our CXF tools - identify
possible workarounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBWS-3264
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3264
Project: JBoss Web Services
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Richard Opalka
Assignee: Alessio Soldano
Fix For: jbossws-cxf-4.0.0.Beta2
<opalka> dmlloyd, I found ugly dependency -
http://fpaste.org/9UXj/
<stuartdouglas> opalka: I actually hacked up something last night to try and find
those problems
<opalka> dmlloyd, stuartdouglas this is the call resulting to this dependency -
we're using log4j configurators -
http://fpaste.org/aKXp/
<dmlloyd> why?
<dmlloyd> (a) you shouldn't do that, (b) to fix the problem add
"javax.api" to log4j's module dep
<opalka> dmlloyd, this is question for alessio. I have no idea? Probably Alessio
want's to use log4j config facility
<dmlloyd> ok well if we're doing that it's pretty lame because we go
through many hoops to avoid using the log4j config facility
<opalka> dmlloyd, method javadoc isn't more descriptive as well -
http://fpaste.org/DyVx/ I'll need to ask Alessio
<opalka> dmlloyd, but just to confirm, we don't want org.apache.logging ->
org.w3c.dom dependency in AS7, right ?
* opalka don't like this dependency
<dmlloyd> no, org.apache.logging is something completely different
<dmlloyd> it should be org.apache.log4j -> javax.api
<opalka> dmlloyd, and do we want this dependency ?
<dmlloyd> yeah, it's fine to add
<dmlloyd> but we don't want this manual log4j configuration
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: