Re: [rules-users] Question on contains operator with integer

Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object of the comparison for containment that is an int primitive. So my thoughts are if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules parser allow the creation of condition that is invalid? -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.