I know one can debug rules (put breakpoints in .drl and ruleflow files) when
running/debugging an application as a Drools Application.
However, I would like to debug rules when my application is running in JBoss AS
- just like we do a normal debugging of a Remote application running in a
different JVM ,by enabling the JDWP on the server
(-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n) and then
connecting to the specified port.
Basically, I would like to be able to debug both my Java classes and rules
together. Is it possible?
I am new to drools community...
I want to develop an expert system for medical application using drools.
can you please let me know how to use history data in drools... Because
as far as i know we have to keep all the data in the working memory to
How should i implement such system?
Would be better if you can provide some reference to existing expert
system implemented using drools.
Thanks in advance.
In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes
Important notice:This e-mail and any attachment thereto contains corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your system. Thank You.
In my tests of the 4.0.3, I have some : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError.
So, I try a simple test with 10.000 sequential execution of 1 rule with no
context and just a workingmemorylogger and I have the error :
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
My code is :
public class ExecReglesMemotyTest
private static final Reader DRL = new
private static final String FICHIER_LOG = "session";
* @param args
public static void main(String args)
PackageBuilder builder = new PackageBuilder();
RuleBase ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
StatefulSession session = ruleBase.newStatefulSession();
WorkingMemoryFileLogger logger = new WorkingMemoryFileLogger(session);
catch (Exception e)
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
with this rule (doesn't matter):
#created on: Fri Nov 09 15:48:45 CET 2007
#list any import classes here.
I try this in 4.0.1, and it's working (no OutOfMemoryError)
What's the problem ?
thanks for any information,
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/java.lang.OutOfMemoryError%3A-Java-heap-space-tf477...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In order to make writing drl files easy and not requiring writers to be
developers, I have written some JavaAssist code that dynamically creates a
subclass and new methods in memory.
If for example there is a REAL java class called 'com.foo.Instance'. Via
javasssist, I create a new in-memory subclass called 'com.foo.InstanceEx'.
The new class dynamically creates a new getter called getFoo(). The drl
writer would like to directly reference 'foo' in the drl file like so:
i : Instance(foo == 'fee')
The problem is, in order to reference foo, I would need the drl file to do
But I cannot do that because InstanceEx does not exist at runtime. The
error I get, which is an obvious one, is "Unable to create Field Extractor
for 'foo' of '[ClassObjectType class=com.foo.Instance]' in rule 'Test' :
Is there a way to include a dynamic import of a JavaAssist class while I am
constructing the KnowledgeBase instances to run the rules so that I can
reference that new method?
I would hope to have something similar to:
KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder = ....
Any help GREATLY appreciated.
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Challenge-Using-javas...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
A quick follow-up: this error occurs only when I have rules using the MVEL dialect. I rewrote the MVEL rule in the HelloWorld.drl to use the Java dialect, and now the problem is gone. I may need to raise this issue on the MVEL mailing list instead.
----------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, including PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. If you are not the intended recipient, any use or disclosure of this information is STRICTLY PROHIBITED; you are requested to delete this e-mail and any attachments, notify the sender immediately, and notify the LabCorp Privacy Officer at privacyofficer(a)labcorp.com or call (877) 23-HIPAA.
I had a very basic doubt. 'Rule Base' and 'Knowledge Base' are two different concepts (may be from implementation point of view )?
I got this doubt when I was going through section '220.127.116.11.Â Drools execution server' of drools guvnor (v5.0) where it was written like :
The drools execution server (drools-server) module is a war which you can deploy to execute "knowledgebases (rulebases)" remotely for any sort of client application
The thing is that , I have created Knowledge base from changeset.xml as follows :
kagent = KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgent( "MyRuleAgent" );
kagent.applyChangeSet( ResourceFactory.newUrlResource( changesetUrl ) );
kbase = kagent.getKnowledgeBase();
Now if I wish to get Rule Base corresponding to my changeset(or rather my DRL file) using 'this kbase object' , how can I do that ?
This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system.
I'm testing the ProcessEventListener on a simple process and I get the
"after" events in reverse order.
Process completed : 1283915643204
Node left: 5: 1283915643268
Node triggered: 5: 1283915643268
Node left: 4: 1283915643268
Node triggered: 4: 1283915643269
Node left: 3: 1283915643269
Node triggered: 3: 1283915643270
Node left: 2: 1283915643270
Node triggered: 2: 1283915643270
Node left: 1: 1283915643270
Node triggered: 1: 1283915643271
Node left: 0: 1283915643271
Node triggered: 0: 1283915643271
Process started : 1283915643271
I'm just printing the node id and the time in milliseconds.
Is this the way is supposed to be?
I guess technically "after" could be anytime after, but if I use the
afterProcessStarted event, I get it after the whole process has
completed!, which it's not useful at all.
The "before" events work as expected I think.
I'm using Drools Flow 5.1.0.