7:25 a.m.
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The effective dates would be
checked against this date instead of today's date. By default the effective dates
would be checked with System date. But in some cases we would need to execute the rules in
a 'back-dated' mode.
Use case.
Let's say in insurance industry there are commission calculation rules for an agent.
On these rules the effective dates are appropriate (as per their needs). Now when an agent
is promoted and his/her promotion date is couple of months back then we would want to
calculate the commission once again with the date as 2 months back.
The nearest I could see is TimeMachine, as this is being used during execution of rules.
Although I could not find a way to set the TimeMachine in release 4.0.4.
Has anyone tried something like this before?
Regards,
- Nimesh
"The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the other 90%
of the time" - Murphy's Law
MASTEK LTD.
Making a valuable difference
Mastek in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4:09 p.m.
As I understand it, the problem is that you have legacy code that uses
the system date in it's calculations and you cannot fix that so it will
take a date parameter, right? If so, then my recommendation is to fix
the legacy software if possible since messing with the system date gives
me the willies. If you can't fix it, then anything that can be called
from Java to set the system date (e.g.Runtime.exec(...).waitfor()?)
should be callable from the 'then' part of a rule. Make that call, call
your legacy code, then make the call to set the date back. But that is
so ugly, please don't tell anyone I had anything to do with it.
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/5/2008 1:25 AM:
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The
effective dates would be checked against this date instead of today's
date. By default the effective dates would be checked with System
date. But in some cases we would need to execute the rules in a
'back-dated' mode.
Use case.
Let's say in insurance industry there are commission calculation rules
for an agent. On these rules the effective dates are appropriate (as
per their needs). Now when an agent is promoted and his/her promotion
date is couple of months back then we would want to calculate the
commission once again with the date as 2 months back.
The nearest I could see is TimeMachine, as this is being used during
execution of rules. Although I could not find a way to set the
TimeMachine in release 4.0.4.
Has anyone tried something like this before?
Regards,
- Nimesh
"The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes
the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law
While so very true, this is not Murphy's Law, which I think of as
"Whatever can go wrong, probably will." (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law)
Your rule here is called the 90-90 rule:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-ninety_rule
7 a.m.
I was not able to portray the right picture :(. Here's another shot at clarifying my
situation.
Let's say we have a commission rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation 07-08"
date-effective "01-Apr-2007"
date-expires "30-Mar-2008"
when
....
then
....
end
Now for the next financial year we define a new rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation 08-09"
date-effective "01-Apr-2008"
date-expires "30-Mar-2009"
when
....
then
....
end
Now let's say today's date is 15th April 2008. An agent is promoted today with
effective date as 1st March 2008. Hence his commission needs to be recalculated as per the
"Commission Calculation 07-08" rule and not the effective rule as on today i.e.
"Commission Calculation 08-09". For rest of the agents commission would be
calculated based on the rule effective today i.e. 15th April 2008. Hence a need to pass a
date during execution of rule based on which the right rule would be chosen.
Basically there is no legacy code as part of my example but a need to fire the rules that
are effective on a date other than the system date always.
I have seen similar functionality in other rules engines too. Can this be done in JBoss
Rules? If yes, is TimeMachine the right way of doing it?
Regards,
- Nimesh
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:40 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Setting date during execution of rules.
As I understand it, the problem is that you have legacy code that uses the system date in
it's calculations and you cannot fix that so it will take a date parameter, right? If
so, then my recommendation is to fix the legacy software if possible since messing with
the system date gives me the willies. If you can't fix it, then anything that can be
called from Java to set the system date (e.g.Runtime.exec(...).waitfor()?) should be
callable from the 'then' part of a rule. Make that call, call your legacy code,
then make the call to set the date back. But that is so ugly, please don't tell anyone
I had anything to do with it.
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/5/2008 1:25 AM:
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The effective dates would be
checked against this date instead of today's date. By default the effective dates
would be checked with System date. But in some cases we would need to execute the rules in
a 'back-dated' mode.
Use case.
Let's say in insurance industry there are commission calculation rules for an agent.
On these rules the effective dates are appropriate (as per their needs). Now when an agent
is promoted and his/her promotion date is couple of months back then we would want to
calculate the commission once again with the date as 2 months back.
The nearest I could see is TimeMachine, as this is being used during execution of rules.
Although I could not find a way to set the TimeMachine in release 4.0.4.
Has anyone tried something like this before?
Regards,
- Nimesh
"The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the other 90%
of the time" - Murphy's Law
While so very true, this is not Murphy's Law, which I think of as "Whatever can
go wrong, probably will." (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law)
Your rule here is called the 90-90 rule: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-ninety_rule
MASTEK LTD.
Making a valuable difference
Mastek in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3:30 p.m.
I am probably still misunderstanding, but it seems that the effective
and expires dates are constants that can be used in the left hand side
of the rules:
rule "Commission Calculation 07-08"
when
$agent: Agent( promotedDate >= "01-Apr-2007",
promotedDate <= "30-Mar-2008")
$sale: Sale( agent = $agent, $amount: amount )
....
then
$agent.addCommission( $sale, $amount, .09); // .09 is
the commission rate for this rule
....
end
Now for the next financial year we define a new rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation 08-09"
when
$agent: Agent( promotedDate >= "01-Apr-2008",
promotedDate <= "30-Mar-2009")
$sale: Sale( agent = $agent, $amount: amount )
....
then
$agent.addCommission( $sale, $amount, .06); // .06 is
the commission rate for this rule
end
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/6/2008 1:00 AM:
I was not able to portray the right picture L. Here's another shot at
clarifying my situation.
Let's say we have a commission rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation *07-08*"
*date-effective "01-Apr-2007"*
*date-expires "30-Mar-2008"*
when
....
then
....
end
Now for the next financial year we define a new rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation *08-09*"
*date-effective "01-Apr-2008"*
*date-expires "30-Mar-2009"*
when
....
then
....
end
Now let's say /_today's date is 15^th April 2008_/. An agent is
promoted today with /_effective date as 1^st March 2008_/. Hence his
commission needs to be recalculated as per the "Commission Calculation
*07-08*" rule and *_not_* the effective rule as on today i.e.
"Commission Calculation *08-09*". For rest of the agents commission
would be calculated based on the rule effective today i.e. 15^th April
2008. Hence a need to pass a date during execution of rule based on
which the right rule would be chosen.
Basically there is no legacy code as part of my example but a need to
fire the rules that are effective on a date other than the system date
always.
I have seen similar functionality in other rules engines too. Can this
be done in JBoss Rules? If yes, is TimeMachine the right way of doing it?
Regards,
- Nimesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:40 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Setting date during execution of rules.
As I understand it, the problem is that you have legacy code that uses
the system date in it's calculations and you cannot fix that so it
will take a date parameter, right? If so, then my recommendation is to
fix the legacy software if possible since messing with the system date
gives me the willies. If you can't fix it, then anything that can be
called from Java to set the system date
(e.g.Runtime.exec(...).waitfor()?) should be callable from the 'then'
part of a rule. Make that call, call your legacy code, then make the
call to set the date back. But that is so ugly, please don't tell
anyone I had anything to do with it.
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/5/2008 1:25 AM:
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The
effective dates would be checked against this date instead of today's
date. By default the effective dates would be checked with System
date. But in some cases we would need to execute the rules in a
'back-dated' mode.
Use case.
Let's say in insurance industry there are commission calculation rules
for an agent. On these rules the effective dates are appropriate (as
per their needs). Now when an agent is promoted and his/her promotion
date is couple of months back then we would want to calculate the
commission once again with the date as 2 months back.
The nearest I could see is TimeMachine, as this is being used during
execution of rules. Although I could not find a way to set the
TimeMachine in release 4.0.4.
Has anyone tried something like this before?
Regards,
- Nimesh
"The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes
the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law
While so very true, this is not Murphy's Law, which I think of as
"Whatever can go wrong, probably will." (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law)
Your rule here is called the 90-90 rule:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-ninety_rule
MASTEK LTD.
Making a valuable difference
Mastek in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
12:41 p.m.
Effective dates in 4.0.x come from Calendar.getInstance() so unless you
change the time that the java Calendar sees you cannot go back in time.
Trunk, and 5.0 (TBR in Q2/Q3), has a class called TimeMachine which
allows you to set the date.
If you need control of this, and in 4.0.x, you will not be able to use
the effective date attributes. Instead I recommend you create your own
hashmap ofr effective dates per rule and use the agenda filter to
excludes ones that aren't within the allowed dates.
Mark
Nimesh Muley wrote:
I was not able to portray the right picture L. Here's another shot at
clarifying my situation.
Let's say we have a commission rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation *07-08*"
*date-effective "01-Apr-2007"*
*date-expires "30-Mar-2008"*
when
....
then
....
end
Now for the next financial year we define a new rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation *08-09*"
*date-effective "01-Apr-2008"*
*date-expires "30-Mar-2009"*
when
....
then
....
end
Now let's say /_today's date is 15^th April 2008_/. An agent is
promoted today with /_effective date as 1^st March 2008_/. Hence his
commission needs to be recalculated as per the "Commission Calculation
*07-08*" rule and *_not_* the effective rule as on today i.e.
"Commission Calculation *08-09*". For rest of the agents commission
would be calculated based on the rule effective today i.e. 15^th April
2008. Hence a need to pass a date during execution of rule based on
which the right rule would be chosen.
Basically there is no legacy code as part of my example but a need to
fire the rules that are effective on a date other than the system date
always.
I have seen similar functionality in other rules engines too. Can this
be done in JBoss Rules? If yes, is TimeMachine the right way of doing it?
Regards,
- Nimesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:40 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Setting date during execution of rules.
As I understand it, the problem is that you have legacy code that uses
the system date in it's calculations and you cannot fix that so it
will take a date parameter, right? If so, then my recommendation is to
fix the legacy software if possible since messing with the system date
gives me the willies. If you can't fix it, then anything that can be
called from Java to set the system date
(e.g.Runtime.exec(...).waitfor()?) should be callable from the 'then'
part of a rule. Make that call, call your legacy code, then make the
call to set the date back. But that is so ugly, please don't tell
anyone I had anything to do with it.
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/5/2008 1:25 AM:
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The
effective dates would be checked against this date instead of today's
date. By default the effective dates would be checked with System
date. But in some cases we would need to execute the rules in a
'back-dated' mode.
Use case.
Let's say in insurance industry there are commission calculation rules
for an agent. On these rules the effective dates are appropriate (as
per their needs). Now when an agent is promoted and his/her promotion
date is couple of months back then we would want to calculate the
commission once again with the date as 2 months back.
The nearest I could see is TimeMachine, as this is being used during
execution of rules. Although I could not find a way to set the
TimeMachine in release 4.0.4.
Has anyone tried something like this before?
Regards,
- Nimesh
"The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes
the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law
While so very true, this is not Murphy's Law, which I think of as
"Whatever can go wrong, probably will." (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law)
Your rule here is called the 90-90 rule:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-ninety_rule
MASTEK LTD.
Making a valuable difference
Mastek in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
8:20 a.m.
Hi Scott,
Mark's reply has answered my question, but I feel I need to reply to this so that my
use case was clear.
I cannot use the promotion date in the rule definition because this rule is related to
commission process based on premiums, targets etc for the agent. Promotion is a cross
cutting 'functional' concern which may affect various processes in the
organization including commission calculation. And hence the need to keep the cross
cutting concern out of the rule definition.
What you have mentioned may work but would not be the right way to solve.
p.s. Sincerely appreciate your efforts in trying to understand the problem space.
Thanks.
Regards,
- Nimesh
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 8:00 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Setting date during execution of rules.
I am probably still misunderstanding, but it seems that the effective and expires dates
are constants that can be used in the left hand side of the rules:
rule "Commission Calculation 07-08"
when
$agent: Agent( promotedDate >= "01-Apr-2007",
promotedDate <= "30-Mar-2008")
$sale: Sale( agent = $agent, $amount: amount )
....
then
$agent.addCommission( $sale, $amount, .09); // .09 is the commission
rate for this rule
....
end
Now for the next financial year we define a new rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation 08-09"
when
$agent: Agent( promotedDate >= "01-Apr-2008",
promotedDate <= "30-Mar-2009")
$sale: Sale( agent = $agent, $amount: amount )
....
then
$agent.addCommission( $sale, $amount, .06); // .06 is the commission
rate for this rule
end
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/6/2008 1:00 AM:
I was not able to portray the right picture :(. Here's another shot at clarifying my
situation.
Let's say we have a commission rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation 07-08"
date-effective "01-Apr-2007"
date-expires "30-Mar-2008"
when
....
then
....
end
Now for the next financial year we define a new rule as follows
rule "Commission Calculation 08-09"
date-effective "01-Apr-2008"
date-expires "30-Mar-2009"
when
....
then
....
end
Now let's say today's date is 15th April 2008. An agent is promoted today with
effective date as 1st March 2008. Hence his commission needs to be recalculated as per the
"Commission Calculation 07-08" rule and not the effective rule as on today i.e.
"Commission Calculation 08-09". For rest of the agents commission would be
calculated based on the rule effective today i.e. 15th April 2008. Hence a need to pass a
date during execution of rule based on which the right rule would be chosen.
Basically there is no legacy code as part of my example but a need to fire the rules that
are effective on a date other than the system date always.
I have seen similar functionality in other rules engines too. Can this be done in JBoss
Rules? If yes, is TimeMachine the right way of doing it?
Regards,
- Nimesh
________________________________
From:
rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:40 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Setting date during execution of rules.
As I understand it, the problem is that you have legacy code that uses the system date in
it's calculations and you cannot fix that so it will take a date parameter, right? If
so, then my recommendation is to fix the legacy software if possible since messing with
the system date gives me the willies. If you can't fix it, then anything that can be
called from Java to set the system date (e.g.Runtime.exec(...).waitfor()?) should be
callable from the 'then' part of a rule. Make that call, call your legacy code,
then make the call to set the date back. But that is so ugly, please don't tell anyone
I had anything to do with it.
Nimesh Muley's message received 3/5/2008 1:25 AM:
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The effective dates would be
checked against this date instead of today's date. By default the effective dates
would be checked with System date. But in some cases we would need to execute the rules in
a 'back-dated' mode.
Use case.
Let's say in insurance industry there are commission calculation rules for an agent.
On these rules the effective dates are appropriate (as per their needs). Now when an agent
is promoted and his/her promotion date is couple of months back then we would want to
calculate the commission once again with the date as 2 months back.
The nearest I could see is TimeMachine, as this is being used during execution of rules.
Although I could not find a way to set the TimeMachine in release 4.0.4.
Has anyone tried something like this before?
Regards,
- Nimesh
"The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the other 90%
of the time" - Murphy's Law
While so very true, this is not Murphy's Law, which I think of as "Whatever can
go wrong, probably will." (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law)
Your rule here is called the 90-90 rule: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-ninety_rule
MASTEK LTD.
Making a valuable difference
Mastek in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
________________________________
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
MASTEK LTD.
Making a valuable difference
Mastek in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20' Software Service Exporters List.
In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that of Mastek
Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited does not accept any
responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with
it are confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or
entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use
of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility of the recipient to
run the virus check on e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you have received
this e-mail in error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5899
days inactive
5904
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Mark Proctor -
Nimesh Muley -
Scott Reed