11:55 a.m.
Hello
I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
visibility in the previous one.
I've got following rule:
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
(def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
then
$param.setEnabled(true);
update($param);
end
It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I
get following exception:
[Error: unexpected end of statement]
[Near : {... def ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 4]
at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:1446)
at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
at org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:128)
at org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternBuilder.java:397)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
at org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.java:65)
at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java:388)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:566)
at org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:35)
at
com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(DependenciesBean.java:110)
It is
(def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing
it. What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name,
and the line looks like:
($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
instead of the exception I get DRL error:
[DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl cannot be
cast to java.lang.Class']
For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder = KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr), ResourceType.DRL);
if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
StackTrace.error(this, err);
}
throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
}
knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages( kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
}
I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
version such problem exists.
12:14 p.m.
Why do you need the and in the rule?
Have you tried
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
then
$param.setEnabled(true);
update($param);
end
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
> bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
> Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
>
> Hello
>
> I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
> visibility in the previous one.
>
> I've got following rule:
>
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex ==
-1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
> then
> $param.setEnabled(true);
> update($param);
> end>
>
> It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
> following exception:
>
> [Error: unexpected end of statement]
> [Near : {... def ....}]
> ^
> [Line: 1, Column: 4]
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
> 46)
> at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
> 28)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
> )
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
> uilder.java:397)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
> a:65)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
> :388)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
> .java:566)
> at
> org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
> va:35)
> at
> com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
> denciesBean.java:110)
>
>
> It is
>
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
> What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and the
line
> looks like:
>
> ($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> instead of the exception I get DRL error:
>
> [DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
> compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
> cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
>
>
> For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
>
> public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
> KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>
> kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
> ResourceType.DRL);
> if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
> for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
> StackTrace.error(this, err);
> }
> throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
> }
> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
> kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
> }
>
>
> I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
> version such problem exists.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from
your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be
monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please
do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United
Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603
8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
2:25 p.m.
Thanks for your answer Thomas. It showed that this construct works fine
either way with 5.3.0.CR1, but it's other rule that causes the error:
rule "restriction number paramId: 1, id: 0"
when
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == true)
$def : EmParamDefinition(this == $param.paramDefinitionId)
$cust : EmCustomParamDefinition(this == $param.customParamDef)
$constr: EmNumberConstraint(this == $cust.constraints)
$restr: EmNumberRestriction(this == $constr.restrictions[0], min <=
$param.requiredValue, max >= $param.requiredValue)
then
EmRulesUtils.logRuleExecution(kcontext);
result.addValidParam($param);
end
and DRL error:
[DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related
to compilation
failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl cannot
be cast to java.lang.Class']
It compiles successfully when I remove
this == $constr.restrictions[0]
part from last line of LHS.Again, it worked well in 5.1.1.
On 10/05/2011 12:14 PM, Swindells, Thomas wrote:
Why do you need the and in the rule?
Have you tried
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
then
$param.setEnabled(true);
update($param);
end
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
> bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
> Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
>
> Hello
>
> I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
> visibility in the previous one.
>
> I've got following rule:
>
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
> then
> $param.setEnabled(true);
> update($param);
> end>
>
> It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
> following exception:
>
> [Error: unexpected end of statement]
> [Near : {... def ....}]
> ^
> [Line: 1, Column: 4]
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
> 46)
> at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
> 28)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
> )
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
> uilder.java:397)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
> a:65)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
> :388)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
> .java:566)
> at
> org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
> va:35)
> at
> com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
> denciesBean.java:110)
>
>
> It is
>
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
> What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and the
line
> looks like:
>
> ($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> instead of the exception I get DRL error:
>
> [DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
> compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
> cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
>
>
> For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
>
> public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
> KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>
> kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
> ResourceType.DRL);
> if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
> for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
> StackTrace.error(this, err);
> }
> throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
> }
> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
> kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
> }
>
>
> I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
> version such problem exists.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from
your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be
monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please
do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United
Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603
8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:44 p.m.
Write this like so:
EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions[0]),...
-W
2011/10/5 Wacław Borowiec <wborowiec(a)proximetry.pl>
Thanks for your answer Thomas. It showed that this construct works fine either way with
5.3.0.CR1, but it's other rule that causes the error:
rule "restriction number paramId: 1, id: 0"
when
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == true)
$def : EmParamDefinition(this == $param.paramDefinitionId)
$cust : EmCustomParamDefinition(this == $param.customParamDef)
$constr: EmNumberConstraint(this == $cust.constraints)
$restr: EmNumberRestriction(this == $constr.restrictions[0], min <=
$param.requiredValue, max >= $param.requiredValue)
then
EmRulesUtils.logRuleExecution(kcontext);
result.addValidParam($param);
end
and DRL error:
[DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl cannot be
cast to java.lang.Class']
It compiles successfully when I remove
this == $constr.restrictions[0]
part from last line of LHS. Again, it worked well in 5.1.1.
On 10/05/2011 12:14 PM, Swindells, Thomas wrote:
Why do you need the and in the rule?
Have you tried
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
then
$param.setEnabled(true);
update($param);
end
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
Hello
I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
visibility in the previous one.
I've got following rule:
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
(def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
then
$param.setEnabled(true);
update($param);
end>
It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
following exception:
[Error: unexpected end of statement]
[Near : {... def ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 4]
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
46)
at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
28)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
uilder.java:397)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
a:65)
at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
:388)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
.java:566)
at
org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
va:35)
at
com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
denciesBean.java:110)
It is
(def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and the
line
looks like:
($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
instead of the exception I get DRL error:
[DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
ResourceType.DRL);
if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
StackTrace.error(this, err);
}
throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
}
knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
}
I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
version such problem exists.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from
your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be
monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please
do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United
Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603
8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:45 p.m.
Correction:
EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0] ),...
On 5 October 2011 14:44, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Write this like so:
EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions[0]),...
-W
> part from last line of LHS. Again, it worked well in 5.1.1.
>
> On 10/05/2011 12:14 PM, Swindells, Thomas wrote:
>
> Why do you need the and in the rule?
> Have you tried
>
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
>
> def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
> then
> $param.setEnabled(true);
> update($param);
> end
>
> Thomas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
> bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
> Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
>
> Hello
>
> I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
> visibility in the previous one.
>
> I've got following rule:
>
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
> then
> $param.setEnabled(true);
> update($param);
> end>
>
> It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
> following exception:
>
> [Error: unexpected end of statement]
> [Near : {... def ....}]
> ^
> [Line: 1, Column: 4]
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
> 46)
> at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
> 28)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
> )
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
> uilder.java:397)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
> a:65)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
> :388)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
> .java:566)
> at
> org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
> va:35)
> at
> com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
> denciesBean.java:110)
>
>
> It is
>
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
> What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and the
line
> looks like:
>
> ($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> instead of the exception I get DRL error:
>
> [DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
> compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
> cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
>
>
> For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
>
> public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
> KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>
> kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
> ResourceType.DRL);
> if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
> for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
> StackTrace.error(this, err);
> }
> throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
> }
> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
> kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
> }
>
>
> I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
> version such problem exists.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
**************************************************************************************
> This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and
delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as
traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the
environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>
> NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United
Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603
8808 40-00
>
**************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
3:03 p.m.
Thanks for the hint Wolfgang, here are the results:
this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0])
gives
[Error: unexpected end of statement]
[Near : {... ($constr.getRestrictions () [0]) ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 33]
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:1146)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:128)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternBuilder.java:397)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.java:65)
at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java:388)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:566)
at
org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:35)
Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out
of range: -1
at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:207)
at
org.mvel2.optimizers.AbstractOptimizer.capture(AbstractOptimizer.java:222)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.PropertyVerifier.analyze(PropertyVerifier.java:123)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.verify(ExpressionCompiler.java:377)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:273)
at org.mvel2.util.ParseTools.subCompileExpression(ParseTools.java:2136)
at org.mvel2.ast.Substatement.<init>(Substatement.java:37)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:1006)
... 46 more
I tried also without external brackets, but the result is pretty much
the same.
On 10/05/2011 02:45 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
Correction:
EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0] ),...
On 5 October 2011 14:44, Wolfgang Laun<wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Write this like so:
> EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions[0]),...
> -W
>> part from last line of LHS. Again, it worked well in 5.1.1.
>>
>> On 10/05/2011 12:14 PM, Swindells, Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Why do you need the and in the rule?
>> Have you tried
>>
>> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
>> salience 50
>> when
>>
>> def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
>> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
>> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
>> then
>> $param.setEnabled(true);
>> update($param);
>> end
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
>> bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
>> Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
>> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
>> visibility in the previous one.
>>
>> I've got following rule:
>>
>> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
>> salience 50
>> when
>> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
>> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
>> then
>> $param.setEnabled(true);
>> update($param);
>> end>
>>
>> It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
>> following exception:
>>
>> [Error: unexpected end of statement]
>> [Near : {... def ....}]
>> ^
>> [Line: 1, Column: 4]
>> at
>> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
>> at
>> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
>> 46)
>> at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
>> at
>> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
>> 28)
>> at
>> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
>> )
>> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
>> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
>> at
>> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
>> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
>> at
>> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
>> uilder.java:397)
>> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
>> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
>> at
>> org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
>> a:65)
>> at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
>> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
>> at
>> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
>> at
>> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
>> :388)
>> at
>> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
>> .java:566)
>> at
>> org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
>> va:35)
>> at
>> com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
>> denciesBean.java:110)
>>
>>
>> It is
>>
>> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>>
>>
>> line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
>> What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and
the line
>> looks like:
>>
>> ($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
>>
>>
>> instead of the exception I get DRL error:
>>
>> [DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
>> compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
>> cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
>>
>>
>> For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
>>
>> public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
>> KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
>> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>>
>> kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
>> ResourceType.DRL);
>> if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
>> for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
>> StackTrace.error(this, err);
>> }
>> throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
>> }
>> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
>> kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
>> }
>>
>>
>> I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
>> version such problem exists.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
**************************************************************************************
>> This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and
delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as
traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the
environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>>
>> NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX,
United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no.
GB 603 8808 40-00
>>
**************************************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:36 p.m.
I will check these out today. If you can provide an isolated test case,
it helps, otherwise I will try to reproduce from your info in these e-mails.
Edson
2011/10/5 Wacław Borowiec <wborowiec(a)proximetry.pl>
Thanks for the hint Wolfgang, here are the results:
this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0])
gives
[Error: unexpected end of statement]
[Near : {... ($constr.getRestrictions () [0]) ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 33]
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:1146)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:128)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternBuilder.java:397)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
at
org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.java:65)
at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java:388)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:566)
at
org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:35)
Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out
of range: -1
at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:207)
at
org.mvel2.optimizers.AbstractOptimizer.capture(AbstractOptimizer.java:222)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.PropertyVerifier.analyze(PropertyVerifier.java:123)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.verify(ExpressionCompiler.java:377)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:273)
at org.mvel2.util.ParseTools.subCompileExpression(ParseTools.java:2136)
at org.mvel2.ast.Substatement.<init>(Substatement.java:37)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:1006)
... 46 more
I tried also without external brackets, but the result is pretty much
the same.
On 10/05/2011 02:45 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Correction:
> EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0] ),...
>
> On 5 October 2011 14:44, Wolfgang Laun<wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Write this like so:
>> EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions[0]),...
>> -W
>>> part from last line of LHS. Again, it worked well in 5.1.1.
>>>
>>> On 10/05/2011 12:14 PM, Swindells, Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do you need the and in the rule?
>>> Have you tried
>>>
>>> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
>>> salience 50
>>> when
>>>
>>> def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex ==
-1)
>>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
>>> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
>>> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
>>> then
>>> $param.setEnabled(true);
>>> update($param);
>>> end
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
>>> bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
>>> Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
>>> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
>>> visibility in the previous one.
>>>
>>> I've got following rule:
>>>
>>> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
>>> salience 50
>>> when
>>> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
and
>>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>>> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
>>> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
>>> then
>>> $param.setEnabled(true);
>>> update($param);
>>> end>
>>>
>>> It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I
get
>>> following exception:
>>>
>>> [Error: unexpected end of statement]
>>> [Near : {... def ....}]
>>> ^
>>> [Line: 1, Column: 4]
>>> at
>>>
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
>>> at
>>>
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
>>> 46)
>>> at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
>>> at
>>>
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
>>> 28)
>>> at
>>>
org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
>>> )
>>> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
>>> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
>>> at
>>>
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
>>> at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
>>> at
>>>
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
>>> uilder.java:397)
>>> at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
>>> at
org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
>>> at
>>>
org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
>>> a:65)
>>> at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
>>> at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
>>> at
>>> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
>>> at
>>>
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
>>> :388)
>>> at
>>> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
>>> .java:566)
>>> at
>>>
org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
>>> va:35)
>>> at
>>> com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
>>> denciesBean.java:110)
>>>
>>>
>>> It is
>>>
>>> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
>>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>>>
>>>
>>> line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing
it.
>>> What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable
name, and
the line
>>> looks like:
>>>
>>> ($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
>>> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
>>>
>>>
>>> instead of the exception I get DRL error:
>>>
>>> [DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably
related to
>>> compilation
failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
>>> cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
>>>
>>>
>>> For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
>>>
>>> public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
>>> KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
>>> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>>>
>>> kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
>>> ResourceType.DRL);
>>> if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
>>> for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors()
){
>>> StackTrace.error(this, err);
>>> }
>>> throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors"
);
>>> }
>>> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
>>> kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
>>> version such problem exists.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
**************************************************************************************
>>> This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If
you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies.
The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for
employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not
print this e-mail unless necessary.
>>>
>>> NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex,
TW18 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales.
Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00
>>>
**************************************************************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
4608
days inactive
4608
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Edson Tirelli -
Swindells, Thomas -
Wacław Borowiec -
Wolfgang Laun