8:29 a.m.
Hello,
we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get
following error:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163)
at org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788)
at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22)
at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9)
at
org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225)
at
org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150)
We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every
service call. Hope we are doing everything right in code. Full source
code of advice can be found at:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for...
Regards
Pavel
8:34 a.m.
You should insert
Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap());
Instead of new HashMap()
This error is a java error, not a drools one, it only means that two threads are, at the
same time, accessing/modifying the same Map.
The reason for this depends of your project
-----Message d'origine-----
De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] De
la part de Pavel Tavoda
Envoyé : lundi 28 juin 2010 15:29
À : Rules Users List
Objet : [rules-users] Possible bug
Hello,
we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get following error:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163)
at org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788)
at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22)
at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9)
at
org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225)
at
org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150)
We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every service call. Hope we
are doing everything right in code. Full source code of advice can be found at:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for...
Regards
Pavel
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the
property of the Capgemini Group. It is
intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to
read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part
thereof. If you receive this message
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
8:36 a.m.
My last message presumes that you inserted a Map fact, was I wrong?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] De
la part de Pavel Tavoda
Envoyé : lundi 28 juin 2010 15:29
À : Rules Users List
Objet : [rules-users] Possible bug
Hello,
we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get following error:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163)
at org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788)
at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22)
at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9)
at
org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225)
at
org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150)
We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every service call. Hope we
are doing everything right in code. Full source code of advice can be found at:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for...
Regards
Pavel
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the
property of the Capgemini Group. It is
intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to
read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part
thereof. If you receive this message
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
10:16 a.m.
Maybe yes, advice is generic but I looked at source code and from what
I see iteration is going through some internal cache which is maybe
concurrently modified not through items of my Hash.
for ( ObjectTypeNode node : ruleBase.getRete().getObjectTypeNodes(
this.entryPoint ).values() ) {
Anyway modifying fact will be wrong idea ;-).
Pavel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:36 PM, PAYET, Manuel
<manuel.payet(a)capgemini.com> wrote:
My last message presumes that you inserted a Map fact, was I wrong?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] De
la part de Pavel Tavoda
Envoyé : lundi 28 juin 2010 15:29
À : Rules Users List
Objet : [rules-users] Possible bug
Hello,
we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get following error:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163)
at org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788)
at
org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22)
at
org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23)
at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9)
at
org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225)
at
org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150)
We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every service call. Hope we
are doing everything right in code. Full source code of advice can be found at:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for...
Regards
Pavel
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the
property of the Capgemini Group. It is
intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to
read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part
thereof. If you receive this message
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
10:37 a.m.
Pavel,
This is a bug. It was fixed last week:
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2556
When you say you are using the "official" 5.0 version, do you mean the
Red Hat supported version or the community version? If you are a Red Hat
subscriber, you can ask them to provide you with a patch.
Edson
2010/6/28 Pavel Tavoda <pavel.tavoda(a)gmail.com>
Maybe yes, advice is generic but I looked at source code and from
what
I see iteration is going through some internal cache which is maybe
concurrently modified not through items of my Hash.
for ( ObjectTypeNode node : ruleBase.getRete().getObjectTypeNodes(
this.entryPoint ).values() ) {
Anyway modifying fact will be wrong idea ;-).
Pavel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:36 PM, PAYET, Manuel
<manuel.payet(a)capgemini.com> wrote:
> My last message presumes that you inserted a Map fact, was I wrong?
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] De la part de Pavel Tavoda
> Envoyé : lundi 28 juin 2010 15:29
> À : Rules Users List
> Objet : [rules-users] Possible bug
>
> Hello,
> we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get
following error:
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
> at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822)
> at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171)
> at
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163)
> at
org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143)
> at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046)
> at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001)
> at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788)
> at
org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22)
> at
org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7)
> at
org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23)
> at
org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9)
> at
org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225)
> at
org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150)
>
> We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every
service call. Hope we are doing everything right in code. Full source code
of advice can be found at:
>
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for...
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is
> intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are not authorized to
> read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message
or any part thereof. If you receive this message
> in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of
this message.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
10:42 a.m.
We are using community edition. I will ask customer to update to RedHat version.
Thank you
Pavel
2010/6/28 Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com>:
Pavel,
This is a bug. It was fixed last week:
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2556
When you say you are using the "official" 5.0 version, do you mean the
Red Hat supported version or the community version? If you are a Red Hat
subscriber, you can ask them to provide you with a patch.
Edson
2010/6/28 Pavel Tavoda <pavel.tavoda(a)gmail.com>
>
> Maybe yes, advice is generic but I looked at source code and from what
> I see iteration is going through some internal cache which is maybe
> concurrently modified not through items of my Hash.
> for ( ObjectTypeNode node : ruleBase.getRete().getObjectTypeNodes(
> this.entryPoint ).values() ) {
>
> Anyway modifying fact will be wrong idea ;-).
>
> Pavel
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:36 PM, PAYET, Manuel
> <manuel.payet(a)capgemini.com> wrote:
> > My last message presumes that you inserted a Map fact, was I wrong?
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> > [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] De la part de Pavel Tavoda
> > Envoyé : lundi 28 juin 2010 15:29
> > À : Rules Users List
> > Objet : [rules-users] Possible bug
> >
> > Hello,
> > we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get
> > following error:
> > java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> > at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793)
> > at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822)
> > at
> >
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171)
> > at
> >
org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163)
> > at
> > org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143)
> > at
> > org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046)
> > at
> > org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001)
> > at
> > org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788)
> > at
> >
org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22)
> > at
> >
org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7)
> > at
> > org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23)
> > at
> > org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9)
> > at
> >
org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225)
> > at
> >
org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150)
> >
> > We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every
> > service call. Hope we are doing everything right in code. Full source code
> > of advice can be found at:
> >
> >
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Pavel
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
> > and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is
> > intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, you are not authorized to
> > read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message
> > or any part thereof. If you receive this message
> > in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of
> > this message.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5065
days inactive
5065
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Edson Tirelli -
Pavel Tavoda -
PAYET, Manuel