11:13 p.m.
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and
have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, each with a specific
ruleflow-group defined. And I have a rule flow file defined. Altogether
everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using the
RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
11:40 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and
have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using
the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the rule...
You cannot call a rule explicitely, they are not methods. The agenda has
the rules that are ready to fire, you can use a an agenda filter to stop
a rule firing, not to call a rule.
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
* *
* *
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
12:11 a.m.
Manukyan, Sergey's message received 10/17/2007 5:13 PM:
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn’t find the answer anywhere and
have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using the
RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn’t help, it didn’t fire the rule…
How is it supposed to be done?
A couple of reasons a rule won't fire: if the facts aren't asserted or the
conditions aren't met.
2:44 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and
have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, each with a specific
ruleflow-group defined. And I have a rule flow file defined. Altogether
everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using the
RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the rule...
You cannot call a rule explicitely, they are not methods.
I know. As I said earlier. All rules fire just fine when I am inserting
an object. But when using RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("specific rule
name") - NONE of the rules fire, specifically the single rule I am
interested in. Without this filter - that rule fires just fine along
with others.... Again this happened when rule has ruleflow-group
defined. When ruleflow-group is not defined - it fires again just fine
when using RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter. Is RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
supposed to work with rules with or without ruleflow-group defined? If
so then it looks like a bug to me...
The agenda has the rules that are ready to fire, you can use a an agenda
filter to stop a rule firing, not to call a rule.
Do you mean using RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter or anything else?
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
________________________________
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
2:45 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey's message received 10/17/2007 5:13 PM:
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and
have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using
the
RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the
rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
A couple of reasons a rule won't fire: if the facts aren't
asserted or the conditions aren't met.
Scott, both conditions are met. The problem is in
filtering agenda to a single rule, and it only happens when rules have
ruleflow-group defined...
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
3:07 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Manukyan, Sergey's message received 10/17/2007 5:13 PM:
> Folks,
>
>
>
> I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and
> have not get response to it in my previous email.
>
>
>
> Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
> *ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
> Altogether everything works fine.
>
>
>
> Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using
>
the
> RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the rule...
>
>
>
> How is it supposed to be done?
>
A couple of reasons a rule won't fire: if the facts aren't
asserted or the conditions aren't met.
Scott, both conditions are met. The problem is in
filtering agenda to a single rule, and it only happens when rules have
ruleflow-group defined...
If a rule defines a ruleflow-group then it can only fire when that
ruleflow-group is active. So the ruleflow-group, when active, place's
its activations onto the Agenda where when the rule is attempted to be
fired the AgendaFilter may stop that rule from firing.
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:07 p.m.
Sergey,
In theory you can use AgendaFilters in combination with ruleflow. Note however that the
agenda filter will prevent certain other activations from firing. As a result, your
ruleflow could be blocked somewhere by not being able to execute certain activations:
* An ruleflow group will only continue if all its activations have been completed.
Preventing one such activation from firing (using an AgendaFilter) will prevent the
ruleflow group from completing and thus the ruleflow from continuing.
* Internally, the ruleflow implementation also uses rules for executing a ruleflow, like
for example when evaluating conditions in a split node. You should make sure you do not
block these rules from executing.
Please know that using AgendaFilters like this is discouraged. It can be used for testing
and debugging purposes, but you should probably not use it like this in production. There
are probably other ways to do what you are trying to do here.
If you really want to fire only one rule for a ruleflow group, I would suggest you make
your AgendaFilter more specific, so it does not block rules from other ruleflow groups.
You can do this by making your own implementation of an AgendaFilter, for example a
RuleNameInRuleFlowGroupEqualsAgendaFilter, which only blocks rules in the same ruleflow
group from firing if they do not have the right name.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
From: Manukyan, Sergey
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and have not get
response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, each with a specific ruleflow-group defined.
And I have a rule flow file defined. Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using the
RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the rule.
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:44 p.m.
Kris Verlaenen wrote:
Sergey,
In theory you can use AgendaFilters in combination with ruleflow.
Note however that the agenda filter will prevent certain other
activations from firing. As a result, your ruleflow could be blocked
somewhere by not being able to execute certain activations:
Now that we have
ruleflow, maybe agendafilters should go lower down, so
all it does is cancel the actual firing. but the before and after events
fire, likewise any other managmenet. I think this is needed now. might
change for trunk.
* An ruleflow group will only continue if all its activations have
been completed. Preventing one such activation from firing (using an
AgendaFilter) will prevent the ruleflow group from completing and thus
the ruleflow from continuing.
* Internally, the ruleflow implementation also uses rules for
executing a ruleflow, like for example when evaluating conditions in a
split node. You should make sure you do not block these rules from
executing.
Please know that using AgendaFilters like this is discouraged. It can
be used for testing and debugging purposes, but you should probably
not use it like this in production. There are probably other ways to
do what you are trying to do here.
If you really want to fire only one rule for a ruleflow group, I would
suggest you make your AgendaFilter more specific, so it does not block
rules from other ruleflow groups. You can do this by making your own
implementation of an AgendaFilter, for example a
RuleNameInRuleFlowGroupEqualsAgendaFilter, which only blocks rules in
the same ruleflow group from firing if they do not have the right name.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Manukyan, Sergey <mailto:SManukyan@lear.com>
*To:* rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:13 PM
*Subject:* [rules-users] firing specific rule
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere
and have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set.
Using the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire
the rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**
**
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5:11 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Manukyan, Sergey's message received 10/17/2007 5:13 PM:
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere and
have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set. Using
the
RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
A couple of reasons a rule won't fire: if the facts aren't
asserted or the conditions aren't met.
Scott, both conditions are met. The problem is in
filtering agenda to a single rule, and it only happens
when rules have
ruleflow-group defined...
If a rule defines a ruleflow-group then it can only fire when that
ruleflow-group is active. So the ruleflow-group, when active, place's
its activations onto the Agenda where when the rule is attempted to be
fired the AgendaFilter may stop that rule from firing.
The
ruleflow-group is active. Here is what I do:
session.insert(fact);
session.startProcess("Validation");
session.fireAllRules(new RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("My specific rule I
want to be fired")); // doesn't fire any rule
Looks right
to you?
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
5:16 p.m.
Kris,
It looks like whatever name I choose for RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter - it
doesn't fire any rules. It may be the name of my rule I want to fire or
some bogus name, just the fact that I am using it - make all rules not
fire.
By the way the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("rule name") - makes sure
that "rule name" - is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS fired?
-Sergey
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Kris Verlaenen
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:08 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Sergey,
In theory you can use AgendaFilters in combination with ruleflow. Note
however that the agenda filter will prevent certain other activations
from firing. As a result, your ruleflow could be blocked somewhere by
not being able to execute certain activations:
* An ruleflow group will only continue if all its activations have been
completed. Preventing one such activation from firing (using an
AgendaFilter) will prevent the ruleflow group from completing and thus
the ruleflow from continuing.
* Internally, the ruleflow implementation also uses rules for executing
a ruleflow, like for example when evaluating conditions in a split node.
You should make sure you do not block these rules from executing.
Please know that using AgendaFilters like this is discouraged. It can
be used for testing and debugging purposes, but you should probably not
use it like this in production. There are probably other ways to do
what you are trying to do here.
If you really want to fire only one rule for a ruleflow group, I would
suggest you make your AgendaFilter more specific, so it does not block
rules from other ruleflow groups. You can do this by making your own
implementation of an AgendaFilter, for example a
RuleNameInRuleFlowGroupEqualsAgendaFilter, which only blocks rules in
the same ruleflow group from firing if they do not have the right name.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
From: Manukyan, Sergey <mailto:SManukyan@lear.com>
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer
anywhere and have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, each with a specific
ruleflow-group defined. And I have a rule flow file defined. Altogether
everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set.
Using the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the
rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
________________________________
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5:25 p.m.
Sergey,
In theory you can use AgendaFilters in combination with ruleflow. Note
however that the agenda filter will prevent certain other activations
from firing. As a result, your ruleflow could be blocked somewhere by
not being able to execute certain activations:
* An ruleflow group will only continue if all its activations have been
completed. Preventing one such activation from firing (using an
AgendaFilter) will prevent the ruleflow group from completing and thus
the ruleflow from continuing.
* Internally, the ruleflow implementation also uses rules for executing
a ruleflow, like for example when evaluating conditions in a split node.
You should make sure you do not block these rules from executing.
Please know that using AgendaFilters like this is discouraged. It can
be used for testing and debugging purposes, but you should probably not
use it like this in production. There are probably other ways to do
what you are trying to do here.
What would be the other way to do it?
If you really want to fire only one rule for a ruleflow group, I would
suggest you make your AgendaFilter more specific, so it does not block
rules from other ruleflow groups. You can do this by making your own
implementation of an AgendaFilter, for example a
RuleNameInRuleFlowGroupEqualsAgendaFilter, which only blocks rules in
the same ruleflow group from firing if they do not have the right name.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
From: Manukyan, Sergey <mailto:SManukyan@lear.com>
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer
anywhere and have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, each with a specific
ruleflow-group defined. And I have a rule flow file defined. Altogether
everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set.
Using the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire the
rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
________________________________
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6:07 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Kris,
It looks like whatever name I choose for *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
-- *it doesn't fire any rules. It may be the name of my rule I want to
fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using it -- make all
rules not fire.
By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("rule name") - *makes sure
that "*rule name*" -- is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS fired?
Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting and
waiting on here for an answer :)
-Sergey
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Kris Verlaenen
*Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:08 AM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Sergey,
In theory you can use AgendaFilters in combination with ruleflow.
Note however that the agenda filter will prevent certain other
activations from firing. As a result, your ruleflow could be blocked
somewhere by not being able to execute certain activations:
* An ruleflow group will only continue if all its activations have
been completed. Preventing one such activation from firing (using an
AgendaFilter) will prevent the ruleflow group from completing and thus
the ruleflow from continuing.
* Internally, the ruleflow implementation also uses rules for
executing a ruleflow, like for example when evaluating conditions in a
split node. You should make sure you do not block these rules from
executing.
Please know that using AgendaFilters like this is discouraged. It can
be used for testing and debugging purposes, but you should probably
not use it like this in production. There are probably other ways to
do what you are trying to do here.
If you really want to fire only one rule for a ruleflow group, I would
suggest you make your AgendaFilter more specific, so it does not block
rules from other ruleflow groups. You can do this by making your own
implementation of an AgendaFilter, for example a
RuleNameInRuleFlowGroupEqualsAgendaFilter, which only blocks rules in
the same ruleflow group from firing if they do not have the right name.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Manukyan, Sergey <mailto:SManukyan@lear.com>
*To:* rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:13 PM
*Subject:* [rules-users] firing specific rule
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere
and have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set.
Using the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire
the rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6:08 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Sergey,
In theory you can use AgendaFilters in combination with ruleflow.
Note however that the agenda filter will prevent certain other
activations from firing. As a result, your ruleflow could be blocked
somewhere by not being able to execute certain activations:
* An ruleflow group will only continue if all its activations have
been completed. Preventing one such activation from firing (using an
AgendaFilter) will prevent the ruleflow group from completing and thus
the ruleflow from continuing.
* Internally, the ruleflow implementation also uses rules for
executing a ruleflow, like for example when evaluating conditions in a
split node. You should make sure you do not block these rules from
executing.
Please know that using AgendaFilters like this is discouraged. It can
be used for testing and debugging purposes, but you should probably
not use it like this in production. There are probably other ways to
do what you are trying to do here.
What would be the other way to do it?
As kris stated at the moment if you are using ruleflow you can't agenda
filters will break it. Use a semahore fact or something, to control
execution manually.
If you really want to fire only one rule for a ruleflow group, I would
suggest you make your AgendaFilter more specific, so it does not block
rules from other ruleflow groups. You can do this by making your own
implementation of an AgendaFilter, for example a
RuleNameInRuleFlowGroupEqualsAgendaFilter, which only blocks rules in
the same ruleflow group from firing if they do not have the right name.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Manukyan, Sergey <mailto:SManukyan@lear.com>
*To:* rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:13 PM
*Subject:* [rules-users] firing specific rule
Folks,
I have to restate the question as didn't find the answer anywhere
and have not get response to it in my previous email.
Using 4.0.2. So I have a set of rules, _each_ with a specific
*ruleflow-group *defined. And I have a rule flow file defined.
Altogether everything works fine.
Now I need to fire a single specific rule from this rule set.
Using the RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter didn't help, it didn't fire
the rule...
How is it supposed to be done?
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6:57 p.m.
Mark Proctor's message received 10/18/2007 12:07 PM:
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
>
> Kris,
>
>
>
> It looks like whatever name I choose for *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter –
> *it doesn’t fire any rules. It may be the name of my rule I want to
> fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using it – make all
> rules not fire.
>
>
>
> By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter(“rule name”) - *makes sure
> that “*rule name*” – is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS fired?
>
Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting and
waiting on here for an answer :)
I know the documentation is not clear. I think it would be helpful to fix this so it's
clear which
way the filtering works, either by documenting it clearly or by changing the method name?
11:25 p.m.
By the way, I see value of the AgendaFilter to be eliminated and use
instead Predicate interface from apache commons collections:
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/Predicate.html
as the API that supports Predicate logic is pretty rich and afford
creation of complex predicates using PredicateUtils :
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/PredicateUtils.html
just my 2 cents ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Mark Proctor's message received 10/18/2007 12:07 PM:
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
>
> Kris,
>
>
>
> It looks like whatever name I choose for *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
-
> *it doesn't fire any rules. It may be the name of my rule I
want to
> fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using it - make all
> rules not fire.
>
>
>
> By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("rule name") - *makes
sure
> that "*rule name*" - is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS
fired?
>
Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting and
waiting on here for an answer :)
I know the documentation is not clear. I think it would be helpful to
fix this so it's clear which
way the filtering works, either by documenting it clearly or by changing
the method name?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
12:03 a.m.
Scott Reed wrote:
Mark Proctor's message received 10/18/2007 12:07 PM:
> Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
>>
>> Kris,
>>
>>
>>
>> It looks like whatever name I choose for *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
>> – *it doesn’t fire any rules. It may be the name of my rule I want
>> to fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using it – make
>> all rules not fire.
>>
>>
>>
>> By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter(“rule name”) - *makes
>> sure that “*rule name*” – is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS fired?
>>
> Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting and
> waiting on here for an answer :)
I know the documentation is not clear. I think it would be helpful to
fix this so it's clear which way the filtering works, either by
documenting it clearly or by changing the method name?
Open a jira with the
attached preferred wording. You guys will be able
to described it in a way others can understand it, far better than me.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
12:06 a.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
By the way, I see value of the AgendaFilter to be eliminated and use
instead Predicate interface from apache commons collections:
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/Predicate.html
as the API that supports Predicate logic is pretty rich and afford
creation of complex predicates using PredicateUtils :
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/PredicateUtils.html
just my 2 cents ;)
People don't like dependencies, you can easily implement AgendaFilter
using commons Predicate - would make a good article for an aspiring user :)
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Mark Proctor's message received 10/18/2007 12:07 PM:
> Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
>
>> Kris,
>>
>>
>>
>> It looks like whatever name I choose for *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
>>
-
>> *it doesn't fire any rules. It may be the name of my rule I want to
>> fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using it - make all
>> rules not fire.
>>
>>
>>
>> By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("rule name") - *makes
>>
sure
>> that "*rule name*" - is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS fired?
>>
>>
> Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting and
> waiting on here for an answer :)
>
I know the documentation is not clear. I think it would be helpful to
fix this so it's clear which
way the filtering works, either by documenting it clearly or by changing
the method name?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:26 p.m.
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
By the way, I see value of the AgendaFilter to be eliminated and use
instead Predicate interface from apache commons collections:
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/Predicate.html
as the API that supports Predicate logic is pretty rich and afford
creation of complex predicates using PredicateUtils :
http://commons.apache.org/collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collect
ions/PredicateUtils.html
just my 2 cents ;)
People don't like dependencies, you can easily implement AgendaFilter
using commons Predicate - would make a good article for an aspiring user
:)
Good point. It just is a bit confusing at first.
How about renaming it from AgendaFilter to ActivationFilter, as it
actually deals with Activations, not Agendas...?
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] firing specific rule
Mark Proctor's message received 10/18/2007 12:07 PM:
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Kris,
It looks like whatever name I choose for
*RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter
-
*it doesn't fire any rules. It may be the name of my
rule I want to
fire or some bogus name, just the fact that I am using
it - make all
rules not fire.
By the way the *RuleNameEqualsAgendaFilter("rule name")
- *makes
sure
that "*rule name*" - is NOT fired? Or makes sure it IS
fired?
Read the docs and if you still aren't sure try it. Beats sitting
and
waiting on here for an answer :)
I know the documentation is not clear. I think it would be helpful to
fix this so it's clear which
way the filtering works, either by documenting it clearly or by changing
the method name?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6034
days inactive
6036
days old
17 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Kris Verlaenen -
Manukyan, Sergey -
Mark Proctor -
Scott Reed