6:01 a.m.
Hello All,
Has anyone faced a situation where a fact gets modified more than once
within a given DRL. The modification is required so that the other rules
properly fire based on the consequence of the earlier.
I am able to get through the modifyRetract() and modifyInsert() once in a
rule consequence, but the second time i do it, it goes into an infinite loop
and results in out of memory.
Why is it that i cant modify the object more than once. In such a case, how
to deal with business scenarios which need this.
Also, is it possible to handle the execution of another DRL within one DRL.
Thanks
Natraj Gudla
9:41 a.m.
Natraj,
You mean modifying twice inside the same rule consequence?
There should be no problem in modifying a fact twice inside the same
consequence besides wasted effort, so if you are going into an infinite
loop, that is a bug. Would you please open a JIRA with a test case showing
the problem? Having said that, there is no reason to modify a fact twice
inside the same consequence block, so if that is the case, you may also
check your code again.
Now, if you are talking about modifying a fact in the consequence of 2
different rules, then you need to verify if your modification is not causing
rules to be reevaluated and fired in loops, what is possible to happen and
you need to fix your rules to avoid that.
[]s
Edson
2007/7/19, Natraj Gudla <natraj.forums(a)gmail.com>:
Hello All,
Has anyone faced a situation where a fact gets modified more than once
within a given DRL. The modification is required so that the other rules
properly fire based on the consequence of the earlier.
I am able to get through the modifyRetract() and modifyInsert() once in a
rule consequence, but the second time i do it, it goes into an infinite loop
and results in out of memory.
Why is it that i cant modify the object more than once. In such a case,
how to deal with business scenarios which need this.
Also, is it possible to handle the execution of another DRL within one
DRL.
Thanks
Natraj Gudla
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
10:43 p.m.
Hello Edson,
It is the modifications in different rule consequences and not the single
one. I have pasted the 4 rules which are involved here...
My frist two rules are mutually exclusive as are the next two. When i
execute, Calculate Business Profit,1 fires, followed by Calcualte AIC. As
soon as this second rule fires, i see the system going into an infinite
loop, reevluating all the rules once again. the no-loop true does not work
here.
I have a business scenario where i need to modify the object in the second
rule, as there are further rules which use it.
Is this an expected behavior??? Or is My Code wrong?
*rule "Calculate Business profit,1"*
salience 1000
no-loop true
when
emi : EMIAgainstProperty ( businessProfit2 > (businessProfit1 * 1.5) )
then
modifyRetract(emi);
emi.setBusinessProfit((emi.getBusinessProfit1
()+emi.getBusinessProfit2())/2);
modifyInsert(emi);
end
*rule "Calculate Business profit,2"*
salience 999
no-loop true
when
emi : EMIAgainstProperty ( businessProfit2 <= (businessProfit1 * 1.5) )
then
modifyRetract(emi);
emi.setBusinessProfit(emi.getBusinessProfit2());
modifyInsert(emi);
end
*rule "Calculate AIC"*
salience 998
no-loop true
when
emi: EMIAgainstProperty( businessProfit > ( businessProfit1 * 2) )
then
System.out.println(" AIC "+emi.getBusinessProfit());
modifyRetract(emi);
emi.setAIC(emi.getBusinessProfit1()*2);
modifyInsert(emi);
end
*rule "Calculate AIC1"*
no-loop true
salience 997
when
emi: EMIAgainstProperty( businessProfit <= ( businessProfit1 * 2) )
then
modifyRetract(emi);
System.out.println(" AIC Less "+emi.getBusinessProfit());
emi.setAIC(emi.getBusinessProfit());
modifyInsert(emi);
end
On 7/19/07, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
Natraj,
You mean modifying twice inside the same rule consequence?
There should be no problem in modifying a fact twice inside the same
consequence besides wasted effort, so if you are going into an infinite
loop, that is a bug. Would you please open a JIRA with a test case showing
the problem? Having said that, there is no reason to modify a fact twice
inside the same consequence block, so if that is the case, you may also
check your code again.
Now, if you are talking about modifying a fact in the consequence of 2
different rules, then you need to verify if your modification is not causing
rules to be reevaluated and fired in loops, what is possible to happen and
you need to fix your rules to avoid that.
[]s
Edson
2007/7/19, Natraj Gudla <natraj.forums(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Has anyone faced a situation where a fact gets modified more than once
> within a given DRL. The modification is required so that the other rules
> properly fire based on the consequence of the earlier.
> I am able to get through the modifyRetract() and modifyInsert() once in
> a rule consequence, but the second time i do it, it goes into an infinite
> loop and results in out of memory.
>
> Why is it that i cant modify the object more than once. In such a case,
> how to deal with business scenarios which need this.
>
> Also, is it possible to handle the execution of another DRL within one
> DRL.
>
> Thanks
> Natraj Gudla
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6158
days inactive
6159
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Edson Tirelli -
Natraj Gudla