September 2007 - seam-issues - Jboss List Archives

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1982) Improved documentation for Nested Conversations

by Jacob Orshalick (JIRA)

Improved documentation for Nested Conversations ----------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1982 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1982 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Core Affects Versions: 2.0.0.CR1 Reporter: Jacob Orshalick Nested conversations have been discussed at length on several occasions on the forum. The documentation states: "A conversation may be thought of as a continuable state. Nested conversations allow the application to capture a consistent continuable state at various points in a user interaction, thus insuring truly correct behavior in the face of backbuttoning and workspace management." This gives the impression of use of nested conversations to achieve a continuation server approach. This approach is possible and is described at the forum reference, but it seems that most developers use nested conversations for sub-flows ending the conversation at the end of the sub-flow. This does not allow back-buttoning to the sub-flow (which seems to be in conflict with the documentation above). (I will add a link to an article describing the continuation approach in a few weeks, perhaps it could serve as a patch) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 5 months

1
3
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-903) @Bidirectional to combine @In and @Out

by Andrew (JIRA)

@Bidirectional to combine @In and @Out -------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-903 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-903 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Affects Versions: 1.1.6.GA Reporter: Andrew Priority: Minor IMO, it would be great to have an InOut annotation that can combine In and Out to avoid excessive typing. Examples: Now: @In(required=false, value="someString", scope=ScopeType.EVENT) @Out(required=false, value="someString", scope=ScopeType.EVENT) private String localVariableName; Easier as: @Bidirectional(required=false, value="someString", scope=ScopeType.EVENT) private String localVariableName; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

7
9
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1508) Decouple framework from JSF

by Gavin King (JIRA)

Decouple framework from JSF --------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1508 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1508 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Framework Reporter: Gavin King Assigned To: Gavin King Fix For: 1.3.0.BETA2 We have dependencies there that we don't really need. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

4
10
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-541) ConversationEntry reports the wrong description

by Norman Richards (JIRA)

ConversationEntry reports the wrong description ----------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-541 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-541 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.1.0.CR1 Reporter: Norman Richards Assigned To: Gavin King The linked forum post shows one example of this bug, though it is not directly the issue the poster is complaining of. Using the forum application as a guide, start a conversation and then start a nested conversation. End the nested conversation. The description of the parent conversation in the converstion list on will be incorrect. (it will have the name of the current conversation that just ended) This happens because of the following code: public String getDescription() { if ( isCurrent() ) { String desc = Conversation.instance().description; if (desc!=null) return desc; } return description; } public boolean isCurrent() { Manager manager = Manager.instance(); if ( manager.isLongRunningConversation() ) { return id.equals( manager.getCurrentConversationId() ); } else if ( manager.isNestedConversation() ) { return id.equals( manager.getParentConversationId() ); } else { return false; } } The parent conversation entry is considered "current". (isLongRunning() is false and isNestedConversation() is true) Because of this, the ConversationEntry description is ignored in favor of Conversation.instance().description. (Again, Conversation.instance(), is the nested conversation that just ended) Subsequent requests display the conversation description correctly since they are done in the context of the correct conversation. The isNestedConversation() check looks to be the source of the problem. I can't figure out what case that would make sense for. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

3
9
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1262) Should be able to customize Hibernate validation messages based on context (by page, or role like Seam component scopes)

by Nathaniel Stoddard (JIRA)

Should be able to customize Hibernate validation messages based on context (by page, or role like Seam component scopes) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBSEAM-1262 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1262 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Affects Versions: 1.2.1.GA Reporter: Nathaniel Stoddard Currently, each validation specified a single message resource to be used as the error message. It would be helpful if there was some way to customize the error messages to be used such that in one case "Contact address is required." is displayed, while in others "Billing address is required", for example. Annotating model classes with validation rules limits the reuse of those classes since the validation messages offer limited flexibility. Since validated fields in the domain classes aren't necessarily associated with a UIInput on a page, it would be helpful to have more flexible annotations, such as: @MaxLength(messages = {@Message(role='contactForm', value='contact.too_long'), @Message(role='billingForm', value='billing.too_long')}) private String field; Also needed would be some way of indicated to the UIView which 'role' should be used when validation takes place. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

3
6
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1009) optionally login-require in a more specific page should be able to override a wildcard login-require

by Leo Baschy (JIRA)

optionally login-require in a more specific page should be able to override a wildcard login-require ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1009 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1009 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Patch Components: Security Affects Versions: 1.2.0.GA Environment: all Reporter: Leo Baschy This should be optional to switch on, so no one's existing expectations of security get broken. The point is about having a generic wildcard <page view-id="*" scheme="http" login-required="true"> to secure the whole site, and then allowing specific pages or specific wildcards to have login-required="false". E.g. for a registration (with preview) section as one cannot be logged in if one isn't registered yet. Some may suggest instead forcing pages into dedicated secure and not-secure directories, but in reality if there are multiple reasons to force pages into directories different ways (security, hyperlink management, publishability of URLs, etc.), one cannot serve all of them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

6
9
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1384) Support for Eclipse WTP in seam-gen projects

by Mariusz Smykula (JIRA)

Support for Eclipse WTP in seam-gen projects -------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1384 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1384 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Test Harness, Tools Affects Versions: 1.2.1.GA Reporter: Mariusz Smykula Auto deploy system and support for web application in Eclipse WTP is simple, easy and fast. This is much better solution than deploying with ant. Eclipse WTP 2.0 is comming in near time, so I think better support for WTP will be good. Now, users of WTP cant use Dynamic Web Project for working with application. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

4
7
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1596) Unique Constraint Validator

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

Unique Constraint Validator --------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1596 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1596 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: JSF Affects Versions: 2.0.0.BETA1 Reporter: Pete Muir Priority: Blocker We could have a generic unique constrain validator as part of the model validation. http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059691#4059691 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

8
12
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1954) JDK 1.6 tests failing

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

JDK 1.6 tests failing --------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1954 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1954 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Task Affects Versions: 2.0.0.CR1 Reporter: Pete Muir Running Seam testsuite with JDK 1.6 is giving errors (not surprisingly). http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/JBossSeam-sun16/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

5
15
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1277) ServerConversationContext does not process removals / additions when an exception propagates up

by Chris Rudd (JIRA)

ServerConversationContext does not process removals / additions when an exception propagates up ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1277 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1277 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: Core Affects Versions: 1.2.0.GA Reporter: Chris Rudd I have an Stateful EJB Component that throws an exception (this is expected, im testing that the system can recover from that error). This causes the component to be removed from the seam contexts (via the RemoveInterceptor). Then the exception floats up and is caught by the ExceptionFilter, and is redirected to a new view. All that works correctly. BUT when I return to the conversation that contained the EJB component, the component is still in it (even though the RemoveInterceptor removed it). Ive traced it down to this : ServerConversationContext.remove -- this adds the removal to the removals list, but does not update the session.attributes (the real storage for the context). ServerConversationContext.flush -- this applies the removals / additions to the session attributes map. The problem is that flush is never called when an exception propagates out. Thus the changes to that context are never flushed to the session attributes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 6 months

4
9
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

seam-issues September 2007